FRT
Price
$97.66
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.42B
95 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
REG
Price
$69.82
Change
-$0.18 (-0.26%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.81B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRT vs REG

Header iconFRT vs REG Comparison
Open Charts FRT vs REGBanner chart's image
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$97.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$2.89K
Capitalization8.42B
Regency Centers
Price$69.82
Change-$0.18 (-0.26%)
Volume$18.24K
Capitalization12.81B
FRT vs REG Comparison Chart in %
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
REG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRT vs. REG commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRT is a Buy and REG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FRT: $97.65 vs. REG: $70.00)
Brand notoriety: FRT and REG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRT: 90% vs. REG: 109%
Market capitalization -- FRT: $8.42B vs. REG: $12.81B
FRT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $8.42B. REG’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $12.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileREG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • REG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FRT and REG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while REG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • REG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, REG is a better buy in the short-term than FRT.

Price Growth

FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +1.51% price change this week, while REG (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +0.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Feb 16, 2026.

REG is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.44% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REG($12.8B) has a higher market cap than FRT($8.42B). REG has higher P/E ratio than FRT: REG (32.12) vs FRT (24.78). REG YTD gains are higher at: -2.512 vs. FRT (-8.846). REG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1B vs. FRT (883M). FRT has less debt than REG: FRT (4.57B) vs REG (5.41B). REG has higher revenues than FRT: REG (1.5B) vs FRT (1.24B).
FRTREGFRT / REG
Capitalization8.42B12.8B66%
EBITDA883M1B88%
Gain YTD-8.846-2.512352%
P/E Ratio24.7832.1277%
Revenue1.24B1.5B83%
Total Cash18.6MN/A-
Total Debt4.57B5.41B85%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT vs REG: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
REG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1215
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4923
SMR RATING
1..100
6581
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5356
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7652
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRT's Valuation (75) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as REG (84). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to REG’s over the last 12 months.

REG's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (49). This means that REG’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's SMR Rating (65) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as REG (81). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to REG’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as REG (56). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to REG’s over the last 12 months.

REG's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (76). This means that REG’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTREG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
REG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PATN27.580.22
+0.80%
PACER FDS TR
SPGM77.250.15
+0.19%
SPDR® Portfolio MSCI Global Stk Mkt ETF
BSMR23.670.03
+0.13%
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Muncpl Bd ETF
DYYXF2.69N/A
N/A
Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch)
KTEC17.56-0.11
-0.62%
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH ETF

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with KIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then KIM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
-1.42%
KIM - FRT
87%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
KRG - FRT
87%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
REG - FRT
85%
Closely correlated
-1.77%
AKR - FRT
84%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
BRX - FRT
83%
Closely correlated
-1.81%
More

REG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, REG has been closely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if REG jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To REG
1D Price
Change %
REG100%
-1.77%
FRT - REG
85%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
KIM - REG
79%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
KRG - REG
79%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
BRX - REG
79%
Closely correlated
-1.81%
UE - REG
78%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
More