FRT
Price
$97.63
Change
-$0.02 (-0.02%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
8.42B
94 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAC
Price
$17.27
Change
-$0.27 (-1.54%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.42B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRT vs MAC

Header iconFRT vs MAC Comparison
Open Charts FRT vs MACBanner chart's image
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$97.63
Change-$0.02 (-0.02%)
Volume$655.07K
Capitalization8.42B
Macerich Company (The)
Price$17.27
Change-$0.27 (-1.54%)
Volume$1.2M
Capitalization4.42B
FRT vs MAC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRT vs. MAC commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRT is a Buy and MAC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FRT: $97.65 vs. MAC: $17.54)
Brand notoriety: FRT and MAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRT: 90% vs. MAC: 91%
Market capitalization -- FRT: $8.42B vs. MAC: $4.42B
FRT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $8.42B. MAC’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $4.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAC is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRT is a better buy in the short-term than MAC.

Price Growth

FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +1.51% price change this week, while MAC (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -0.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Feb 16, 2026.

MAC is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.44% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRT($8.42B) has a higher market cap than MAC($4.42B). MAC has higher P/E ratio than FRT: MAC (55.89) vs FRT (24.78). FRT YTD gains are higher at: -8.846 vs. MAC (-9.350). FRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 883M vs. MAC (179M). FRT has less debt than MAC: FRT (4.57B) vs MAC (5.39B). FRT has higher revenues than MAC: FRT (1.24B) vs MAC (993M).
FRTMACFRT / MAC
Capitalization8.42B4.42B190%
EBITDA883M179M493%
Gain YTD-8.846-9.35095%
P/E Ratio24.7855.8944%
Revenue1.24B993M124%
Total Cash18.6MN/A-
Total Debt4.57B5.39B85%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT vs MAC: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
MAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1217
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4945
SMR RATING
1..100
6594
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7633
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAC's Valuation (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (75). This means that MAC’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

MAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (49). This means that MAC’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's SMR Rating (65) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as MAC (94). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to MAC’s over the last 12 months.

MAC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (53). This means that MAC’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

MAC's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (76). This means that MAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTMAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMVFX12.620.05
+0.40%
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity C
BSPPX800.740.53
+0.07%
iShares S&P 500 Index Investor P
NSMAX35.740.02
+0.06%
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value A
SGRNX52.19-0.05
-0.10%
Allspring Growth Inst
GSBAX15.68-0.07
-0.44%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth C

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with KIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then KIM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
-1.42%
KIM - FRT
87%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
KRG - FRT
87%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
REG - FRT
85%
Closely correlated
-1.77%
AKR - FRT
84%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
BRX - FRT
83%
Closely correlated
-1.81%
More

MAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAC has been closely correlated with SPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAC jumps, then SPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAC
1D Price
Change %
MAC100%
-2.23%
SPG - MAC
80%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
FRT - MAC
75%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
SKT - MAC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
AKR - MAC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
IVT - MAC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
More