FRT
Price
$97.86
Change
+$0.26 (+0.27%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.48B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KIM
Price
$20.41
Change
+$0.11 (+0.54%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.88B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRT vs KIM

Header iconFRT vs KIM Comparison
Open Charts FRT vs KIMBanner chart's image
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$97.86
Change+$0.26 (+0.27%)
Volume$2.68K
Capitalization8.48B
Kimco Realty
Price$20.41
Change+$0.11 (+0.54%)
Volume$19.16K
Capitalization13.88B
FRT vs KIM Comparison Chart in %
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KIM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRT vs. KIM commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRT is a StrongBuy and KIM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FRT: $97.63 vs. KIM: $20.31)
Brand notoriety: FRT and KIM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRT: 18% vs. KIM: 19%
Market capitalization -- FRT: $8.48B vs. KIM: $13.88B
FRT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $8.48B. KIM’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $13.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKIM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FRT and KIM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KIM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KIM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRT is a better buy in the short-term than KIM.

Price Growth

FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.76% price change this week, while KIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -1.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Feb 16, 2026.

KIM is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.05% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KIM($13.9B) has a higher market cap than FRT($8.48B). FRT (24.95) and KIM (24.69) have similar P/E ratio . FRT YTD gains are higher at: -8.864 vs. KIM (-10.267). KIM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. FRT (883M). KIM has more cash in the bank: 227M vs. FRT (18.6M). FRT has less debt than KIM: FRT (4.57B) vs KIM (8.28B). KIM has higher revenues than FRT: KIM (2.1B) vs FRT (1.24B).
FRTKIMFRT / KIM
Capitalization8.48B13.9B61%
EBITDA883M1.41B63%
Gain YTD-8.864-10.26786%
P/E Ratio24.9524.69101%
Revenue1.24B2.1B59%
Total Cash18.6M227M8%
Total Debt4.57B8.28B55%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT vs KIM: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
KIM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4647
SMR RATING
1..100
6583
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7592
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KIM's Valuation (63) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (75). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (47). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's SMR Rating (65) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (83). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (61). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (92). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTKIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KIM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVIG42.040.04
+0.11%
Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF
USRD32.97N/A
N/A
Themes US R&D Champions ETF
MSTI20.66N/A
N/A
Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF
UUP28.18-0.01
-0.05%
Invesco DB US Dollar Bullish
NBET33.11-0.37
-1.11%
Neuberger Berman Engy Trnstn & InfrasETF

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with KRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then KRG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
-0.70%
KRG - FRT
88%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
KIM - FRT
87%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
REG - FRT
85%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
AKR - FRT
84%
Closely correlated
-2.20%
BRX - FRT
84%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
More

KIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KIM has been closely correlated with KRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KIM jumps, then KRG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KIM
1D Price
Change %
KIM100%
-0.90%
KRG - KIM
87%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
FRT - KIM
86%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
BRX - KIM
86%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
AKR - KIM
83%
Closely correlated
-2.20%
IVT - KIM
80%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
More