FRT
Price
$102.67
Change
+$1.68 (+1.66%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
8.86B
54 days until earnings call
IRM
Price
$92.18
Change
+$1.10 (+1.21%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
27.23B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRT vs IRM

Header iconFRT vs IRM Comparison
Open Charts FRT vs IRMBanner chart's image
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$102.67
Change+$1.68 (+1.66%)
Volume$638.34K
Capitalization8.86B
Iron Mountain
Price$92.18
Change+$1.10 (+1.21%)
Volume$1.07M
Capitalization27.23B
FRT vs IRM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRT vs. IRM commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRT is a Buy and IRM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FRT: $102.67 vs. IRM: $92.18)
Brand notoriety: FRT and IRM are both not notable
FRT represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while IRM is part of the Specialty Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRT: 81% vs. IRM: 82%
Market capitalization -- FRT: $8.86B vs. IRM: $27.23B
FRT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $8.86B. IRM’s [@Specialty Telecommunications] market capitalization is $27.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry ranges from $92.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.36B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry is $14.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIRM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IRM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IRM is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IRM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IRM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IRM is a better buy in the short-term than FRT.

Price Growth

FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +2.11% price change this week, while IRM (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was -0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.43%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

IRM is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.88% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Specialty Telecommunications (-1.18% weekly)

Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IRM($27.2B) has a higher market cap than FRT($8.86B). IRM has higher P/E ratio than FRT: IRM (658.43) vs FRT (25.99). FRT YTD gains are higher at: -5.229 vs. IRM (-10.810). IRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.89B vs. FRT (883M). IRM has more cash in the bank: 218M vs. FRT (177M). FRT has less debt than IRM: FRT (4.57B) vs IRM (17.9B). IRM has higher revenues than FRT: IRM (6.44B) vs FRT (1.24B).
FRTIRMFRT / IRM
Capitalization8.86B27.2B33%
EBITDA883M1.89B47%
Gain YTD-5.229-10.81048%
P/E Ratio25.99658.434%
Revenue1.24B6.44B19%
Total Cash177M218M81%
Total Debt4.57B17.9B26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT vs IRM: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
IRM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
79
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4833
SMR RATING
1..100
672
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
803
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRT's Valuation (77) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as IRM (99). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to IRM’s over the last 12 months.

IRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (48). This means that IRM’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

IRM's SMR Rating (2) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (67). This means that IRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as IRM (62). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to IRM’s over the last 12 months.

IRM's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRT (80). This means that IRM’s stock grew significantly faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTIRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LPRE26.660.25
+0.95%
Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF
STK32.230.30
+0.94%
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund
IWMW40.260.19
+0.46%
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF
VUSB49.860.06
+0.11%
Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
IWLG51.91-0.31
-0.59%
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with KIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then KIM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
+1.66%
KIM - FRT
87%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
REG - FRT
85%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
KRG - FRT
85%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
AKR - FRT
83%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
BRX - FRT
83%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
More

IRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IRM has been closely correlated with DLR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IRM jumps, then DLR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRM
1D Price
Change %
IRM100%
+1.21%
DLR - IRM
70%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
EQIX - IRM
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
FRT - IRM
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
EQR - IRM
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
KIM - IRM
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
More