FRSPF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.01 (+4.55%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.27M
SRGXF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.01 (+7.14%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
18.35M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRSPF vs SRGXF

Header iconFRSPF vs SRGXF Comparison
Open Charts FRSPF vs SRGXFBanner chart's image
First Phosphate
Price$0.23
Change+$0.01 (+4.55%)
Volume$13.56K
Capitalization15.27M
Surge Copper
Price$0.15
Change+$0.01 (+7.14%)
Volume$9.63K
Capitalization18.35M
FRSPF vs SRGXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRGXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSPF vs. SRGXF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSPF is a Hold and SRGXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FRSPF: $0.23 vs. SRGXF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: FRSPF and SRGXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSPF: 50% vs. SRGXF: 6%
Market capitalization -- FRSPF: $15.27M vs. SRGXF: $18.35M
FRSPF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $15.27M. SRGXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $18.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSRGXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SRGXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FRSPF and SRGXF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRGXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRSPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SRGXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SRGXF is a better buy in the short-term than FRSPF.

Price Growth

FRSPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.36% price change this week, while SRGXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +9.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRGXF($18.3M) has a higher market cap than FRSPF($15.3M). SRGXF YTD gains are higher at: 81.375 vs. FRSPF (30.857). SRGXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 367K vs. FRSPF (-1.07M). FRSPF (0) and SRGXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FRSPFSRGXFFRSPF / SRGXF
Capitalization15.3M18.3M84%
EBITDA-1.07M367K-292%
Gain YTD30.85781.37538%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total CashN/A76.8K-
Total DebtN/A110K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRGXF: Fundamental Ratings
SRGXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSPFSRGXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRGXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBYDF10.13N/A
N/A
Corby Spirit and Wine Ltd.
DRXGF9.56N/A
N/A
Drax Group Plc
GFIOF24.03N/A
N/A
Gold Fields Ltd.
PRVFF3.77N/A
N/A
PRO REAL ESTATE INVT TR
DGNOF0.14-0.01
-5.78%
Diagnos Inc.

FRSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSPF has been loosely correlated with ELMTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRSPF jumps, then ELMTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSPF
1D Price
Change %
FRSPF100%
+4.59%
ELMTF - FRSPF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CLRSF - FRSPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRGXF - FRSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.91%
TIGCF - FRSPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
LSANF - FRSPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SRGXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRGXF and MARIF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRGXF and MARIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRGXF
1D Price
Change %
SRGXF100%
+5.91%
MARIF - SRGXF
28%
Poorly correlated
+24.39%
CSCCF - SRGXF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
IVPAF - SRGXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
FRSPF - SRGXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.59%
AGXPF - SRGXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.04%
More