FRSPF
Price
$0.36
Change
-$0.02 (-5.26%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
43.91M
SGPTF
Price
$0.31
Change
+$0.03 (+10.71%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
33.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRSPF vs SGPTF

Header iconFRSPF vs SGPTF Comparison
Open Charts FRSPF vs SGPTFBanner chart's image
First Phosphate
Price$0.36
Change-$0.02 (-5.26%)
Volume$29.54K
Capitalization43.91M
SAGE POTASH
Price$0.31
Change+$0.03 (+10.71%)
Volume$189.04K
Capitalization33.58M
FRSPF vs SGPTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGPTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSPF vs. SGPTF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSPF is a Hold and SGPTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FRSPF: $0.36 vs. SGPTF: $0.31)
Brand notoriety: FRSPF and SGPTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSPF: 42% vs. SGPTF: 134%
Market capitalization -- FRSPF: $43.91M vs. SGPTF: $33.58M
FRSPF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $43.91M. SGPTF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $33.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGPTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SGPTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FRSPF and SGPTF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGPTF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRSPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SGPTF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGPTF is a better buy in the short-term than FRSPF.

Price Growth

FRSPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.28% price change this week, while SGPTF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +17.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.50% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRSPF($43.9M) has a higher market cap than SGPTF($33.6M). SGPTF YTD gains are higher at: 137.233 vs. FRSPF (102.926). SGPTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.49M vs. FRSPF (-9.36M). SGPTF has more cash in the bank: 2.84M vs. FRSPF (150K). FRSPF (0) and SGPTF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FRSPFSGPTFFRSPF / SGPTF
Capitalization43.9M33.6M131%
EBITDA-9.36M-5.49M171%
Gain YTD102.926137.23375%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash150K2.84M5%
Total DebtN/A2.18M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSPFSGPTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGPTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTXAY39.950.46
+1.16%
Ampol Ltd.
ARLUF47.56N/A
N/A
Aristocrat Leisure Ltd.
OILRF0.28N/A
N/A
Oil Refineries Ltd.
NRCD0.05N/A
N/A
Nashville Records, Inc.
AWCA0.17N/A
N/A
Awaysis Capital Inc.

FRSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSPF has been loosely correlated with ELMTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRSPF jumps, then ELMTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSPF
1D Price
Change %
FRSPF100%
-7.25%
ELMTF - FRSPF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CLRSF - FRSPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRGXF - FRSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
TIGCF - FRSPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.47%
SGPTF - FRSPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+7.09%
More

SGPTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGPTF has been loosely correlated with TGOLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGPTF jumps, then TGOLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGPTF
1D Price
Change %
SGPTF100%
+7.09%
TGOLF - SGPTF
50%
Loosely correlated
+17.92%
MTRN - SGPTF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
HANCF - SGPTF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSM - SGPTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
ERVFF - SGPTF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More