Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSLX vs VMGMX
FRSLX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs VMGMX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
Price$27.20
Change-$0.88 (-3.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets166.03M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$120.44
Change-$3.02 (-2.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.11B
FRSLX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. VMGMX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a Buy and VMGMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 33.1B vs. FRSLX (166M). VMGMX pays higher dividends than FRSLX: VMGMX (0.62) vs FRSLX (0.00). FRSLX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: FRSLX (31 years) vs VMGMX (14 years). FRSLX (1.24) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. VMGMX (21.00). FRSLX (3000) and VMGMX (3000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. VMGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.00 vs. FRSLX (2.67). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 48.04 vs. FRSLX (-23.90).
| FRSLX | VMGMX | FRSLX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.07 | 1,614% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.07 | 1,771% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.646 | 13.082 | 51% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 3000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166M | 33.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.62 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.67 | 9.00 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.35 | 51.02 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.90 | 48.04 | -50% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.88 | 193.71 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers