Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSLX vs VMGIX
FRSLX vs VMGIX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs VMGIX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
Price$26.13
Change-$2.28 (-8.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets169.41M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Investor
Price$107.31
Change-$8.92 (-7.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.91B
FRSLX vs VMGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. VMGIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a Hold and VMGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGIX has more cash in the bank: 31.9B vs. FRSLX (169M). VMGIX pays higher dividends than FRSLX: VMGIX (0.52) vs FRSLX (0.00). FRSLX was incepted earlier than VMGIX: FRSLX (31 years) vs VMGIX (19 years). FRSLX (1.24) is less costly to investors than VMGIX (0.19). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. VMGIX (21.00). FRSLX (3000) and VMGIX (3000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. VMGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.12 vs. FRSLX (-4.88). VMGIX return over 5 years is better than : 23.77 vs. FRSLX (-31.54).
| FRSLX | VMGIX | FRSLX / VMGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.19 | 595% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.19 | 653% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.562 | -2.259 | -202% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 3000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169M | 31.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.88 | 1.12 | -435% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.96 | 36.95 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.54 | 23.77 | -133% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.25 | 213.16 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement