Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSLX vs VMGIX
FRSLX vs VMGIX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs VMGIX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
Price$26.91
Change+$0.30 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets173.52M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Investor
Price$115.30
Change+$1.04 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.45B
FRSLX vs VMGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. VMGIX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a Buy and VMGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGIX has more cash in the bank: 31.5B vs. FRSLX (174M). VMGIX pays higher dividends than FRSLX: VMGIX (0.52) vs FRSLX (0.00). FRSLX was incepted earlier than VMGIX: FRSLX (31 years) vs VMGIX (19 years). FRSLX (1.24) is less costly to investors than VMGIX (0.19). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. VMGIX (21.00). FRSLX (3000) and VMGIX (3000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. VMGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.56 vs. FRSLX (10.24). VMGIX return over 5 years is better than : 70.98 vs. FRSLX (-16.94).
| FRSLX | VMGIX | FRSLX / VMGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.19 | 595% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.19 | 653% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.203 | 15.549 | 14% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 3000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 174M | 31.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.24 | 28.56 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.71 | 59.88 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.94 | 70.98 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.82 | 178.02 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement