Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSLX vs PMBPX
FRSLX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs PMBPX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
Price$25.35
Change-$0.36 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets166.39M
FRSLX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. PMBPX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a Buy and PMBPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 30.6B vs. FRSLX (166M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than FRSLX: PMBPX (0.01) vs FRSLX (0.00). FRSLX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: FRSLX (30 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). FRSLX (1.24) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSLX: PMBPX (0) vs FRSLX (3000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.26 vs. FRSLX (2.80). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 54.31 vs. FRSLX (-13.66).
| FRSLX | PMBPX | FRSLX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.83 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.83 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.722 | 1.933 | -193% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166M | 30.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.80 | 10.26 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.46 | 49.52 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.66 | 54.31 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.98 | 92.68 | -45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers