Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSLX vs PEMGX
FRSLX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs PEMGX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
Price$26.91
Change+$0.30 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets173.52M
FRSLX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a Buy and PEMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. FRSLX (174M). FRSLX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FRSLX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FRSLX (31 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). FRSLX (1.24) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). FRSLX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSLX: PEMGX (1000) vs FRSLX (3000). PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.43 vs. FRSLX (10.24). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 55.06 vs. FRSLX (-16.94).
| FRSLX | PEMGX | FRSLX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.91 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.91 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.203 | 8.564 | 26% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 174M | 33.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.24 | 13.43 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.71 | 48.78 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.94 | 55.06 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.82 | 103.87 | -36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement