Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSLX vs PCBIX
FRSLX vs PCBIX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs PCBIX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
Price$27.20
Change-$0.88 (-3.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets166.03M
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$45.20
Change-$0.72 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.99B
FRSLX vs PCBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. PCBIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a Buy and PCBIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. FRSLX (166M). PCBIX pays higher dividends than FRSLX: PCBIX (0.12) vs FRSLX (0.00). FRSLX was incepted earlier than PCBIX: FRSLX (31 years) vs PCBIX (25 years). FRSLX (1.24) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. PCBIX (10.50). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSLX: PCBIX (0) vs FRSLX (3000). FRSLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.62 vs. PCBIX (-4.65). PCBIX return over 5 years is better than : 33.05 vs. FRSLX (-26.29).
| FRSLX | PCBIX | FRSLX / PCBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.67 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.67 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.304 | 3.029 | 109% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166M | 32B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.62 | -4.65 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.75 | 35.68 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.29 | 33.05 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.69 | 111.81 | -28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers