Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSLX vs FSMAX
FRSLX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs FSMAX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
Price$26.13
Change-$2.28 (-8.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets169.41M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.54
Change+$1.43 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.63B
FRSLX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. FSMAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.6B vs. FRSLX (169M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FRSLX: FSMAX (0.56) vs FRSLX (0.00). FRSLX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FRSLX (31 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FRSLX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSLX: FSMAX (0) vs FRSLX (3000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. FRSLX (-4.88). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.23 vs. FRSLX (-31.54).
| FRSLX | FSMAX | FRSLX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.04 | 3,229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.04 | 3,543% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.562 | 3.050 | 150% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169M | 40.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.88 | 10.51 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.96 | 48.06 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.54 | 19.23 | -164% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.25 | 157.02 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement