Advertisement
FRSH vs YUM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a StrongBuy and YUM is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYUM’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
- FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- YUM’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- YUM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.24% price change this week, while YUM (@Restaurants) price change was -0.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.27%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.94%.
Reported Earning Dates
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.
YUM is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-0.88% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Restaurants (-0.48% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
| FRSH | YUM | FRSH / YUM | |
| Capitalization | 3.29B | 41.5B | 8% |
| EBITDA | -46.32M | 2.64B | -2% |
| Gain YTD | -28.015 | 12.958 | -216% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 29.12 | - |
| Revenue | 782M | 7.91B | 10% |
| Total Cash | 926M | 677M | 137% |
| Total Debt | 36M | 11.4B | 0% |
FRSH | YUM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 33 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRSH's Valuation (54) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (64). This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.
YUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRSH (85). This means that YUM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
YUM's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRSH (93). This means that YUM’s stock grew significantly faster than FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
YUM's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FRSH (63). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (27). This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.
| FRSH | YUM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 33% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 10 days ago 44% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 80% | 8 days ago 40% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 37% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DIHP | 31.43 | 0.17 | +0.56% |
| Dimensional International High Pbly ETF | |||
| JULH | 25.20 | 0.08 | +0.33% |
| Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF -Jul | |||
| QDEC | 31.80 | 0.07 | +0.22% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – Dec | |||
| PSDM | 51.47 | -0.04 | -0.07% |
| PGIM Short Duration Mlt-Sect Bd ETF | |||
| NMB | 25.74 | -0.10 | -0.39% |
| Simplify National Muni Bond ETF | |||
FRSH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been loosely correlated with CNNE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then CNNE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRSH | 100% | N/A | ||
| CNNE - FRSH | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.29% | ||
| COIN - FRSH | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.00% | ||
| HUBS - FRSH | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| QTWO - FRSH | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| CLSK - FRSH | 63% Loosely correlated | -5.09% | ||
More | ||||
YUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUM has been loosely correlated with MCD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUM jumps, then MCD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YUM | 100% | -0.92% | ||
| MCD - YUM | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| QSR - YUM | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| DPZ - YUM | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| FRSH - YUM | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| YUMC - YUM | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||