Advertisement
FRSH vs SDOT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a StrongBuy and SDOT is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSDOT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SDOT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRSH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SDOT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FRSH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SDOT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а +9.77% price change this week, while SDOT (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was +5.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.04%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.05% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.92% weekly)The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| FRSH | SDOT | FRSH / SDOT | |
| Capitalization | 3.36B | 5.85M | 57,431% |
| EBITDA | -46.32M | 9.95M | -466% |
| Gain YTD | -26.345 | -86.966 | 30% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 0.63 | - |
| Revenue | 782M | 668M | 117% |
| Total Cash | 926M | 422K | 219,431% |
| Total Debt | 36M | 11.4M | 316% |
FRSH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FRSH | SDOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 80% | 9 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 3 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
FRSH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been loosely correlated with TEAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then TEAM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRSH | 100% | +2.32% | ||
| TEAM - FRSH | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.22% | ||
| NOW - FRSH | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| CNNE - FRSH | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| COIN - FRSH | 64% Loosely correlated | -6.86% | ||
| HUBS - FRSH | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
More | ||||
SDOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SDOT and FRSH have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SDOT and FRSH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SDOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDOT | 100% | -3.14% | ||
| FRSH - SDOT | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BG - SDOT | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| CNNE - SDOT | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.29% | ||
| RICK - SDOT | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
| WEN - SDOT | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.36% | ||
More | ||||