FRSH
Price
$13.47
Change
-$0.06 (-0.44%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
3.93B
64 days until earnings call
QTWO
Price
$78.73
Change
-$0.10 (-0.13%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
4.92B
58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRSH vs QTWO

Header iconFRSH vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts FRSH vs QTWOBanner chart's image
Freshworks
Price$13.47
Change-$0.06 (-0.44%)
Volume$2.21M
Capitalization3.93B
Q2 Holdings
Price$78.73
Change-$0.10 (-0.13%)
Volume$727.68K
Capitalization4.92B
FRSH vs QTWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSH vs. QTWO commentary
Sep 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a Hold and QTWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 02, 2025
Stock price -- (FRSH: $13.47 vs. QTWO: $78.73)
Brand notoriety: FRSH and QTWO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSH: 48% vs. QTWO: 96%
Market capitalization -- FRSH: $3.93B vs. QTWO: $4.92B
FRSH [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.93B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $320.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the short-term than QTWO.

Price Growth

FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.58% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRSH is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.62% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QTWO($4.92B) has a higher market cap than FRSH($3.93B). FRSH YTD gains are higher at: -16.698 vs. QTWO (-21.778). QTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 77.5M vs. FRSH (-46.32M). FRSH has more cash in the bank: 926M vs. QTWO (532M). FRSH has less debt than QTWO: FRSH (36M) vs QTWO (539M). FRSH has higher revenues than QTWO: FRSH (782M) vs QTWO (743M).
FRSHQTWOFRSH / QTWO
Capitalization3.93B4.92B80%
EBITDA-46.32M77.5M-60%
Gain YTD-16.698-21.77877%
P/E RatioN/A1312.17-
Revenue782M743M105%
Total Cash926M532M174%
Total Debt36M539M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRSH vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
FRSH
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81100
SMR RATING
1..100
9491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2153
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRSH's Valuation (54) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's SMR Rating (91) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (94) in the Restaurants industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QTWO (63) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QTWO (53) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSHQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VWNAX86.43-0.21
-0.24%
Vanguard Windsor™ II Admiral™
MINVX29.37-0.08
-0.27%
Madison Large Cap Y
IEYAX9.66-0.03
-0.31%
Macquarie Climate Solutions A
SMVTX12.79-0.07
-0.54%
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity I
SMITX32.71-0.45
-1.36%
Invesco Summit R5

FRSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been closely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSH
1D Price
Change %
FRSH100%
-0.44%
QTWO - FRSH
69%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
HUBS - FRSH
68%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
CWAN - FRSH
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
AMPL - FRSH
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
NOW - FRSH
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
More

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
-0.13%
FRSH - QTWO
69%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
HUBS - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
ALKT - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
WEAV - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
ADSK - QTWO
59%
Loosely correlated
+9.09%
More