FRSH
Price
$12.84
Change
-$0.26 (-1.98%)
Updated
Sep 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.82B
42 days until earnings call
QTWO
Price
$76.75
Change
-$2.05 (-2.60%)
Updated
Sep 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.92B
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRSH vs QTWO

Header iconFRSH vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts FRSH vs QTWOBanner chart's image
Freshworks
Price$12.84
Change-$0.26 (-1.98%)
Volume$27.15K
Capitalization3.82B
Q2 Holdings
Price$76.75
Change-$2.05 (-2.60%)
Volume$8.69K
Capitalization4.92B
FRSH vs QTWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSH vs. QTWO commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a Buy and QTWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (FRSH: $13.10 vs. QTWO: $78.80)
Brand notoriety: FRSH and QTWO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSH: 62% vs. QTWO: 109%
Market capitalization -- FRSH: $3.82B vs. QTWO: $4.92B
FRSH [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.82B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $311.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the short-term than QTWO.

Price Growth

FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а +4.30% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +70.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRSH is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.80% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QTWO($4.92B) has a higher market cap than FRSH($3.82B). FRSH YTD gains are higher at: -18.986 vs. QTWO (-21.709). QTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 77.5M vs. FRSH (-46.32M). FRSH has more cash in the bank: 926M vs. QTWO (532M). FRSH has less debt than QTWO: FRSH (36M) vs QTWO (539M). FRSH has higher revenues than QTWO: FRSH (782M) vs QTWO (743M).
FRSHQTWOFRSH / QTWO
Capitalization3.82B4.92B78%
EBITDA-46.32M77.5M-60%
Gain YTD-18.986-21.70987%
P/E RatioN/A1313.33-
Revenue782M743M105%
Total Cash926M532M174%
Total Debt36M539M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRSH vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
FRSH
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82100
SMR RATING
1..100
9492
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2050
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRSH's Valuation (53) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's SMR Rating (92) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (94) in the Restaurants industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (62) in the Restaurants industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QTWO (50) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSHQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEFRX32.350.17
+0.53%
First Eagle Rising Dividend Fund R6
HEOFX18.640.09
+0.49%
Hartford Climate Opportunities F
TGVIX33.360.16
+0.48%
Thornburg International Equity I
AMECX27.42N/A
N/A
American Funds Income Fund of Amer A
MFWHX18.07N/A
N/A
MFS Global Total Return R3

FRSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been closely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSH
1D Price
Change %
FRSH100%
+1.63%
QTWO - FRSH
69%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
HUBS - FRSH
67%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
CWAN - FRSH
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
AMPL - FRSH
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
NOW - FRSH
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
More