FRSH
Price
$15.69
Change
+$0.08 (+0.51%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
5.43B
58 days until earnings call
LYFT
Price
$15.53
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
7.74B
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRSH vs LYFT

Header iconFRSH vs LYFT Comparison
Open Charts FRSH vs LYFTBanner chart's image
Freshworks
Price$15.69
Change+$0.08 (+0.51%)
Volume$1.84M
Capitalization5.43B
Lyft
Price$15.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.6M
Capitalization7.74B
FRSH vs LYFT Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSH vs. LYFT commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a Buy and LYFT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FRSH: $15.03 vs. LYFT: $15.98)
Brand notoriety: FRSH: Not notable vs. LYFT: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSH: 56% vs. LYFT: 59%
Market capitalization -- FRSH: $5.43B vs. LYFT: $7.74B
FRSH [@Packaged Software] is valued at $5.43B. LYFT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $7.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLYFT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LYFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the long-term than LYFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYFT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRSH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LYFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LYFT is a better buy in the short-term than FRSH.

Price Growth

FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.58% price change this week, while LYFT (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

LYFT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.13% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYFT($7.74B) has a higher market cap than FRSH($5.43B). LYFT YTD gains are higher at: 23.876 vs. FRSH (-7.050). FRSH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -158.03M vs. LYFT (-188.97M). LYFT has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. FRSH (1.19B). FRSH has less debt than LYFT: FRSH (29.5M) vs LYFT (1.04B). LYFT has higher revenues than FRSH: LYFT (4.4B) vs FRSH (596M).
FRSHLYFTFRSH / LYFT
Capitalization5.43B7.74B70%
EBITDA-158.03M-188.97M84%
Gain YTD-7.05023.876-30%
P/E Ratio1.54N/A-
Revenue596M4.4B14%
Total Cash1.19B1.69B71%
Total Debt29.5M1.04B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRSH vs LYFT: Fundamental Ratings
FRSH
LYFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7375
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76100
SMR RATING
1..100
9385
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1995
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRSH's Valuation (53) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as LYFT (77) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as LYFT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's SMR Rating (85) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FRSH (93) in the Restaurants industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FRSH (57) in the Restaurants industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for LYFT (95) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew significantly faster than LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSHLYFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

FRSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSH
1D Price
Change %
FRSH100%
+0.94%
QTWO - FRSH
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
HUBS - FRSH
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
ANSS - FRSH
60%
Loosely correlated
-5.26%
AMPL - FRSH
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
BRZE - FRSH
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
More

LYFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYFT has been loosely correlated with UBER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LYFT jumps, then UBER could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYFT
1D Price
Change %
LYFT100%
-2.08%
UBER - LYFT
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
EVCM - LYFT
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
QTWO - LYFT
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
FRSH - LYFT
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
TOST - LYFT
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
More