It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLYFT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYFT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.24% price change this week, while LYFT (@Packaged Software) price change was +22.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.27%.
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.
LYFT is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| FRSH | LYFT | FRSH / LYFT | |
| Capitalization | 3.36B | 9.51B | 35% |
| EBITDA | -46.32M | 266M | -17% |
| Gain YTD | -28.015 | 90.465 | -31% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 64.32 | - |
| Revenue | 782M | 6.11B | 13% |
| Total Cash | 926M | 1.79B | 52% |
| Total Debt | 36M | 770M | 5% |
FRSH | LYFT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRSH's Valuation (54) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as LYFT (78) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as LYFT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.
LYFT's SMR Rating (56) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRSH (93) in the Restaurants industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
LYFT's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FRSH (63) in the Restaurants industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for LYFT (98) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew significantly faster than LYFT’s over the last 12 months.
| FRSH | LYFT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 80% | 28 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 66% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CHTTX | 21.63 | 0.18 | +0.84% |
| AMG River Road Mid Cap Value N | |||
| LFLTX | 15.53 | 0.07 | +0.45% |
| Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R5 | |||
| JSGIX | 33.09 | 0.10 | +0.30% |
| JHancock U.S. Growth I | |||
| BIEMX | 16.24 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| William Blair Emerging Mkts Growth R6 | |||
| TWUIX | 114.93 | -0.53 | -0.46% |
| American Century Ultra® I | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been loosely correlated with CNNE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then CNNE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRSH | 100% | N/A | ||
| CNNE - FRSH | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.29% | ||
| COIN - FRSH | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.00% | ||
| HUBS - FRSH | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| QTWO - FRSH | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| CLSK - FRSH | 63% Loosely correlated | -5.09% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYFT has been loosely correlated with EVCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LYFT jumps, then EVCM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LYFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYFT | 100% | +1.61% | ||
| EVCM - LYFT | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| FRSH - LYFT | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| COIN - LYFT | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.00% | ||
| TOST - LYFT | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| UBER - LYFT | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More | ||||