FRSH
Price
$13.09
Change
-$0.07 (-0.53%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.81B
61 days until earnings call
LYFT
Price
$16.92
Change
+$0.12 (+0.71%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.88B
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRSH vs LYFT

Header iconFRSH vs LYFT Comparison
Open Charts FRSH vs LYFTBanner chart's image
Freshworks
Price$13.09
Change-$0.07 (-0.53%)
Volume$2.95M
Capitalization3.81B
Lyft
Price$16.92
Change+$0.12 (+0.71%)
Volume$50.75M
Capitalization6.88B
FRSH vs LYFT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSH vs. LYFT commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a Buy and LYFT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FRSH: $13.09 vs. LYFT: $16.92)
Brand notoriety: FRSH: Not notable vs. LYFT: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSH: 61% vs. LYFT: 280%
Market capitalization -- FRSH: $3.81B vs. LYFT: $6.88B
FRSH [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.81B. LYFT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $6.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLYFT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LYFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the long-term than LYFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYFT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LYFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FRSH and LYFT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.82% price change this week, while LYFT (@Packaged Software) price change was +4.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRSH is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

LYFT is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.19% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYFT($6.88B) has a higher market cap than FRSH($3.81B). LYFT YTD gains are higher at: 31.163 vs. FRSH (-19.048). LYFT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 266M vs. FRSH (-46.32M). LYFT has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. FRSH (926M). FRSH has less debt than LYFT: FRSH (36M) vs LYFT (770M). LYFT has higher revenues than FRSH: LYFT (6.11B) vs FRSH (782M).
FRSHLYFTFRSH / LYFT
Capitalization3.81B6.88B55%
EBITDA-46.32M266M-17%
Gain YTD-19.04831.163-61%
P/E RatioN/A73.57-
Revenue782M6.11B13%
Total Cash926M1.79B52%
Total Debt36M770M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRSH vs LYFT: Fundamental Ratings
FRSH
LYFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6326
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82100
SMR RATING
1..100
9457
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRSH's Valuation (53) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as LYFT (73) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as LYFT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's SMR Rating (57) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRSH (94) in the Restaurants industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FRSH (61) in the Restaurants industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for LYFT (98) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew significantly faster than LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSHLYFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VVILX30.550.17
+0.56%
Vulcan Value Partners Institutional
LCILX27.930.10
+0.36%
ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders IS
TSRPX19.78N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Small Cap Equity Premier
GCMUX38.78-0.10
-0.26%
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value R6
MEICX51.52-0.30
-0.58%
MFS Value C

FRSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been closely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSH
1D Price
Change %
FRSH100%
-0.53%
QTWO - FRSH
69%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
HUBS - FRSH
68%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
CWAN - FRSH
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
AMPL - FRSH
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.72%
SPT - FRSH
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
More

LYFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYFT has been loosely correlated with EVCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LYFT jumps, then EVCM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYFT
1D Price
Change %
LYFT100%
+0.71%
EVCM - LYFT
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
UBER - LYFT
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
FRSH - LYFT
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
TOST - LYFT
48%
Loosely correlated
-3.06%
SPT - LYFT
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
More