FRSH
Price
$11.44
Change
+$0.40 (+3.62%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
31 days until earnings call
HUBS
Price
$536.00
Change
+$1.12 (+0.21%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
39 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FRSH vs HUBS

Header iconFRSH vs HUBS Comparison
Open Charts FRSH vs HUBSBanner chart's image
Freshworks
Price$11.44
Change+$0.40 (+3.62%)
Volume$2.93M
CapitalizationN/A
HUBSPOT
Price$536.00
Change+$1.12 (+0.21%)
Volume$331.35K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FRSH vs HUBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FRSH vs. HUBS commentary
Sep 29, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a StrongBuy and HUBS is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2024
Stock price -- (FRSH: $11.53 vs. HUBS: $495.76)
Brand notoriety: FRSH and HUBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSH: 88% vs. HUBS: 44%
Market capitalization -- FRSH: $5.43B vs. HUBS: $32.27B
FRSH [@Packaged Software] is valued at $5.43B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $32.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRSH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the short-term than HUBS.

Price Growth

FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.02% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRSH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2024.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($32.3B) has a higher market cap than FRSH($5.43B). HUBS YTD gains are higher at: -14.604 vs. FRSH (-50.915). HUBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -81.23M vs. FRSH (-158.03M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. FRSH (1.19B). FRSH has less debt than HUBS: FRSH (29.5M) vs HUBS (788M). HUBS has higher revenues than FRSH: HUBS (2.17B) vs FRSH (596M).
FRSHHUBSFRSH / HUBS
Capitalization5.43B32.3B17%
EBITDA-158.03M-81.23M195%
Gain YTD-50.915-14.604349%
P/E Ratio1.54N/A-
Revenue596M2.17B27%
Total Cash1.19B1.39B86%
Total Debt29.5M788M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRSH vs HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
FRSH
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5611
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7652
SMR RATING
1..100
9494
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8661
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
29100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
40n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRSH's Valuation (54) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as HUBS (78) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (76) in the Restaurants industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's SMR Rating (94) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (94) in the Restaurants industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (86) in the Restaurants industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSHHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
83%
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FRSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.14-0.28
-1.20%
GameStop Corp
TSLA210.60-3.51
-1.64%
Tesla
SPY552.08-11.60
-2.06%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL222.77-6.23
-2.72%
Apple
BTC.X57431.023000-1681.457000
-2.84%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

FRSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been loosely correlated with FSLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then FSLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSH
1D Price
Change %
FRSH100%
-1.28%
FSLY - FRSH
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
APPN - FRSH
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.56%
WEAV - FRSH
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
HUBS - FRSH
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
U - FRSH
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been loosely correlated with INTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then INTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
-0.66%
INTU - HUBS
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
NOW - HUBS
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
PATH - HUBS
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
MNDY - HUBS
49%
Loosely correlated
-5.68%
BRZE - HUBS
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.31%
More