FRSH
Price
$17.43
Change
-$0.03 (-0.17%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.43B
25 days until earnings call
HUBS
Price
$703.71
Change
-$13.62 (-1.90%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.27B
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FRSH vs HUBS

Header iconFRSH vs HUBS Comparison
Open Charts FRSH vs HUBSBanner chart's image
Freshworks
Price$17.43
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
Volume$64.52K
Capitalization5.43B
HUBSPOT
Price$703.71
Change-$13.62 (-1.90%)
Volume$7.6K
Capitalization32.27B
FRSH vs HUBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSH vs. HUBS commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a Hold and HUBS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FRSH: $17.46 vs. HUBS: $717.33)
Brand notoriety: FRSH and HUBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSH: 88% vs. HUBS: 72%
Market capitalization -- FRSH: $5.43B vs. HUBS: $32.27B
FRSH [@Packaged Software] is valued at $5.43B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $32.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRSH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the short-term than HUBS.

Price Growth

FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а +8.11% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRSH is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.66% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($32.3B) has a higher market cap than FRSH($5.43B). FRSH YTD gains are higher at: 7.978 vs. HUBS (2.951). HUBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -81.23M vs. FRSH (-158.03M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. FRSH (1.19B). FRSH has less debt than HUBS: FRSH (29.5M) vs HUBS (788M). HUBS has higher revenues than FRSH: HUBS (2.17B) vs FRSH (596M).
FRSHHUBSFRSH / HUBS
Capitalization5.43B32.3B17%
EBITDA-158.03M-81.23M195%
Gain YTD7.9782.951270%
P/E Ratio1.54N/A-
Revenue596M2.17B27%
Total Cash1.19B1.39B86%
Total Debt29.5M788M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRSH vs HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
FRSH
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1616
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6534
SMR RATING
1..100
9290
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a46

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRSH's Valuation (53) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as HUBS (77) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (65) in the Restaurants industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's SMR Rating (90) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (92) in the Restaurants industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (42) in the Restaurants industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSHHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FRSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY591.64-1.14
-0.19%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X99756.910000-747.585940
-0.74%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.72-0.24
-0.86%
GameStop Corp
TSLA413.82-14.40
-3.36%
Tesla
AAPL228.26-9.61
-4.04%
Apple

FRSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been loosely correlated with FSLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then FSLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSH
1D Price
Change %
FRSH100%
+4.11%
FSLY - FRSH
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
HUBS - FRSH
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
WEAV - FRSH
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
APPN - FRSH
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
BIGC - FRSH
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been loosely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
+1.15%
NOW - HUBS
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
FRSH - HUBS
48%
Loosely correlated
+4.11%
PATH - HUBS
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
PRO - HUBS
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.38%
BRZE - HUBS
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
More