FRSH
Price
$13.47
Change
-$0.06 (-0.44%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
3.93B
64 days until earnings call
HUBS
Price
$483.17
Change
+$6.83 (+1.43%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
25.46B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRSH vs HUBS

Header iconFRSH vs HUBS Comparison
Open Charts FRSH vs HUBSBanner chart's image
Freshworks
Price$13.47
Change-$0.06 (-0.44%)
Volume$2.21M
Capitalization3.93B
HUBSPOT
Price$483.17
Change+$6.83 (+1.43%)
Volume$817.6K
Capitalization25.46B
FRSH vs HUBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSH vs. HUBS commentary
Sep 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a Hold and HUBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 01, 2025
Stock price -- (FRSH: $13.47 vs. HUBS: $483.17)
Brand notoriety: FRSH and HUBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSH: 48% vs. HUBS: 91%
Market capitalization -- FRSH: $3.93B vs. HUBS: $25.46B
FRSH [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.93B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $25.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $320.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the short-term than FRSH.

Price Growth

FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.58% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRSH is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.62% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($25.5B) has a higher market cap than FRSH($3.93B). FRSH YTD gains are higher at: -16.698 vs. HUBS (-30.656). HUBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 126M vs. FRSH (-46.32M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 1.67B vs. FRSH (926M). FRSH has less debt than HUBS: FRSH (36M) vs HUBS (281M). HUBS has higher revenues than FRSH: HUBS (2.85B) vs FRSH (782M).
FRSHHUBSFRSH / HUBS
Capitalization3.93B25.5B15%
EBITDA-46.32M126M-37%
Gain YTD-16.698-30.65654%
P/E RatioN/A7023.44-
Revenue782M2.85B27%
Total Cash926M1.67B55%
Total Debt36M281M13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRSH vs HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
FRSH
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8170
SMR RATING
1..100
9492
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6284
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2177
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRSH's Valuation (54) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (81) in the Restaurants industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's SMR Rating (92) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (94) in the Restaurants industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as HUBS (84) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (77) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSHHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LIAP217.39N/A
N/A
LifeX 2057 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF
LSAF44.32-0.15
-0.34%
LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor® US Cr Eq ETF
SNAV33.52-0.18
-0.53%
Mohr Sector Nav ETF
DSI121.40-0.91
-0.74%
iShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF
IGPT50.88-0.71
-1.37%
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF

FRSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been closely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSH
1D Price
Change %
FRSH100%
-0.44%
QTWO - FRSH
69%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
HUBS - FRSH
68%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
CWAN - FRSH
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
AMPL - FRSH
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
NOW - FRSH
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
+1.43%
CRM - HUBS
72%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
TEAM - HUBS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
NOW - HUBS
69%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
S - HUBS
67%
Closely correlated
+7.10%
FRSH - HUBS
66%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
More