FRSB
Price
$17.37
Change
-$0.23 (-1.31%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
37.37M
KPCUF
Price
$4.76
Change
+$1.21 (+34.08%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
8.71B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRSB vs KPCUF

Header iconFRSB vs KPCUF Comparison
Open Charts FRSB vs KPCUFBanner chart's image
FIRST RESOURCE BAN
Price$17.37
Change-$0.23 (-1.31%)
Volume$600
Capitalization37.37M
KASIKORNBANK Public
Price$4.76
Change+$1.21 (+34.08%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.71B
FRSB vs KPCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSB vs. KPCUF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSB is a StrongBuy and KPCUF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FRSB: $17.37 vs. KPCUF: $4.76)
Brand notoriety: FRSB and KPCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSB: 47% vs. KPCUF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FRSB: $37.37M vs. KPCUF: $8.71B
FRSB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $37.37M. KPCUF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $8.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKPCUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KPCUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KPCUF is a better buy in the long-term than FRSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FRSB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FRSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.27% price change this week, while KPCUF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KPCUF($8.71B) has a higher market cap than FRSB($37.4M). KPCUF has higher P/E ratio than FRSB: KPCUF (8.42) vs FRSB (6.64). KPCUF YTD gains are higher at: 34.077 vs. FRSB (9.033). FRSB has less debt than KPCUF: FRSB (28M) vs KPCUF (254B). KPCUF has higher revenues than FRSB: KPCUF (180B) vs FRSB (18.6M).
FRSBKPCUFFRSB / KPCUF
Capitalization37.4M8.71B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.03334.07727%
P/E Ratio6.648.4279%
Revenue18.6M180B0%
Total Cash5.6MN/A-
Total Debt28M254B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRSB vs KPCUF: Fundamental Ratings
FRSB
KPCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
441
SMR RATING
1..100
521
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4343
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3042
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KPCUF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as FRSB (43). This means that KPCUF’s stock grew similarly to FRSB’s over the last 12 months.

FRSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KPCUF (41). This means that FRSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than KPCUF’s over the last 12 months.

KPCUF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRSB (52). This means that KPCUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRSB’s over the last 12 months.

KPCUF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FRSB (43). This means that KPCUF’s stock grew similarly to FRSB’s over the last 12 months.

FRSB's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as KPCUF (42). This means that FRSB’s stock grew similarly to KPCUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSBKPCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
54%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BDRFF128.63N/A
N/A
Beiersdorf AG
LEGIF84.56N/A
N/A
Leg Immobilien SE
ORBN19.75N/A
N/A
Oregon Bancorp, Inc.
LLLAF0.09N/A
N/A
LEO LITHIUM LTD
BSFAF0.04N/A
N/A
BSF Enterprise Plc

FRSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRSB and KPCUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRSB and KPCUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSB
1D Price
Change %
FRSB100%
-1.31%
KPCUF - FRSB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COLB - FRSB
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.30%
PBFS - FRSB
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
AFNL - FRSB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNRV - FRSB
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KPCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KPCUF and EQGPF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KPCUF and EQGPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KPCUF
1D Price
Change %
KPCUF100%
N/A
EQGPF - KPCUF
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
CNBZ - KPCUF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
CHBAF - KPCUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOUB - KPCUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRSB - KPCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
More