FRRPF
Price
$5.10
Change
+$0.08 (+1.59%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
641.2M
RMCO
Price
$1.33
Change
-$0.06 (-4.32%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
16.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRRPF vs RMCO

Header iconFRRPF vs RMCO Comparison
Open Charts FRRPF vs RMCOBanner chart's image
Fiera Cap
Price$5.10
Change+$0.08 (+1.59%)
Volume$41.4K
Capitalization641.2M
Royalty Management Holding
Price$1.33
Change-$0.06 (-4.32%)
Volume$38.27K
Capitalization16.55M
FRRPF vs RMCO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRRPF vs. RMCO commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRRPF is a Hold and RMCO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FRRPF: $5.10 vs. RMCO: $1.33)
Brand notoriety: FRRPF and RMCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRRPF: 157% vs. RMCO: 47%
Market capitalization -- FRRPF: $641.2M vs. RMCO: $16.55M
FRRPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $641.2M. RMCO’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $16.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRRPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRMCO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRRPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RMCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRRPF is a better buy in the long-term than RMCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRRPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMCO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRRPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMCO is a better buy in the short-term than FRRPF.

Price Growth

FRRPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.59% price change this week, while RMCO (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRRPF($641M) has a higher market cap than RMCO($16.6M). RMCO YTD gains are higher at: 36.264 vs. FRRPF (-17.682). FRRPF has more cash in the bank: 75.2M vs. RMCO (98.4K).
FRRPFRMCOFRRPF / RMCO
Capitalization641M16.6M3,861%
EBITDA190MN/A-
Gain YTD-17.68236.264-49%
P/E Ratio15.62N/A-
Revenue676MN/A-
Total Cash75.2M98.4K76,423%
Total Debt733MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRRPF: Fundamental Ratings
FRRPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
85
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRRPFRMCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLDD11.550.17
+1.49%
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp
NEUP8.500.10
+1.19%
Neuphoria Therapeutics Inc
ALGN202.18N/A
N/A
Align Technology
SR76.41-0.32
-0.42%
Spire
CFFI66.83-1.71
-2.49%
C&F Financial Corp

FRRPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRRPF and RMCO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRRPF and RMCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRRPF
1D Price
Change %
FRRPF100%
N/A
RMCO - FRRPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.32%
IGIFF - FRRPF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
FRMO - FRRPF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
HCGI - FRRPF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMPXF - FRRPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RMCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMCO and PVLUF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMCO and PVLUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMCO
1D Price
Change %
RMCO100%
-4.32%
PVLUF - RMCO
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WT - RMCO
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
FSK - RMCO
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
GCMG - RMCO
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
SAR - RMCO
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
More