FRRPF
Price
$4.05
Change
-$0.21 (-4.93%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
641.2M
GMPXF
Price
$6.08
Change
+$0.25 (+4.29%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
216.03M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRRPF vs GMPXF

Header iconFRRPF vs GMPXF Comparison
Open Charts FRRPF vs GMPXFBanner chart's image
Fiera Cap
Price$4.05
Change-$0.21 (-4.93%)
Volume$37.57K
Capitalization641.2M
RF Capital Group
Price$6.08
Change+$0.25 (+4.29%)
Volume$200
Capitalization216.03M
FRRPF vs GMPXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRRPF vs. GMPXF commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRRPF is a Hold and GMPXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FRRPF: $4.05 vs. GMPXF: $6.08)
Brand notoriety: FRRPF and GMPXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRRPF: 137% vs. GMPXF: 99%
Market capitalization -- FRRPF: $641.2M vs. GMPXF: $216.03M
FRRPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $641.2M. GMPXF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $216.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRRPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGMPXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRRPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GMPXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRRPF is a better buy in the long-term than GMPXF.

Price Growth

FRRPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.93% price change this week, while GMPXF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.10% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRRPF($641M) has a higher market cap than GMPXF($216M). FRRPF has higher P/E ratio than GMPXF: FRRPF (15.62) vs GMPXF (14.12). GMPXF YTD gains are higher at: 18.288 vs. FRRPF (-34.630). FRRPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 190M vs. GMPXF (52.7M). GMPXF has more cash in the bank: 571M vs. FRRPF (75.2M). GMPXF has less debt than FRRPF: GMPXF (120M) vs FRRPF (733M). FRRPF has higher revenues than GMPXF: FRRPF (676M) vs GMPXF (214M).
FRRPFGMPXFFRRPF / GMPXF
Capitalization641M216M297%
EBITDA190M52.7M361%
Gain YTD-34.63018.288-189%
P/E Ratio15.6214.12111%
Revenue676M214M316%
Total Cash75.2M571M13%
Total Debt733M120M611%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRRPF vs GMPXF: Fundamental Ratings
FRRPF
GMPXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8691
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1795
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5526

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRRPF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GMPXF (84). This means that FRRPF’s stock grew significantly faster than GMPXF’s over the last 12 months.

FRRPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GMPXF (100). This means that FRRPF’s stock grew similarly to GMPXF’s over the last 12 months.

FRRPF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as GMPXF (91). This means that FRRPF’s stock grew similarly to GMPXF’s over the last 12 months.

GMPXF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as FRRPF (81). This means that GMPXF’s stock grew similarly to FRRPF’s over the last 12 months.

FRRPF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GMPXF (95). This means that FRRPF’s stock grew significantly faster than GMPXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JUEQX24.99-0.27
-1.07%
JPMorgan US Equity R4
COSTX11.94-0.14
-1.13%
Columbia Overseas Core Institutional 2
RSESX16.62-0.21
-1.25%
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity S
IYSCX12.05-0.17
-1.39%
Macquarie Smid Cap Core Fund Class C
DNDGX19.17-0.46
-2.34%
Dunham Small Cap Growth N

FRRPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRRPF and RMCO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRRPF and RMCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRRPF
1D Price
Change %
FRRPF100%
N/A
RMCO - FRRPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.75%
IGIFF - FRRPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRMO - FRRPF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCGI - FRRPF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMPXF - FRRPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GMPXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMPXF and GCAAF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMPXF and GCAAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMPXF
1D Price
Change %
GMPXF100%
N/A
GCAAF - GMPXF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - GMPXF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRRPF - GMPXF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFXXF - GMPXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAE - GMPXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More