FRPH
Price
$24.56
Change
+$0.25 (+1.03%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
469.32M
SVAUF
Price
$3.59
Change
+$0.07 (+1.99%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.31B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRPH vs SVAUF

Header iconFRPH vs SVAUF Comparison
Open Charts FRPH vs SVAUFBanner chart's image
FRP Holdings
Price$24.56
Change+$0.25 (+1.03%)
Volume$91.02K
Capitalization469.32M
Storagevault Canada
Price$3.59
Change+$0.07 (+1.99%)
Volume$10.4K
Capitalization1.31B
FRPH vs SVAUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRPH vs. SVAUF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRPH is a Hold and SVAUF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FRPH: $24.56 vs. SVAUF: $3.59)
Brand notoriety: FRPH and SVAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRPH: 196% vs. SVAUF: 60%
Market capitalization -- FRPH: $469.32M vs. SVAUF: $1.31B
FRPH [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $469.32M. SVAUF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRPH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSVAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRPH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SVAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SVAUF is a better buy in the long-term than FRPH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRPH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVAUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRPH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SVAUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVAUF is a better buy in the short-term than FRPH.

Price Growth

FRPH (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.24% price change this week, while SVAUF (@Real Estate Development) price change was +1.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.47% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVAUF($1.31B) has a higher market cap than FRPH($469M). SVAUF YTD gains are higher at: 31.022 vs. FRPH (-19.817). SVAUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 168M vs. FRPH (20.5M). FRPH has more cash in the bank: 153M vs. SVAUF (21.5M). FRPH has less debt than SVAUF: FRPH (180M) vs SVAUF (2.18B). SVAUF has higher revenues than FRPH: SVAUF (319M) vs FRPH (42.3M).
FRPHSVAUFFRPH / SVAUF
Capitalization469M1.31B36%
EBITDA20.5M168M12%
Gain YTD-19.81731.022-64%
P/E Ratio87.71N/A-
Revenue42.3M319M13%
Total Cash153M21.5M712%
Total Debt180M2.18B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRPH vs SVAUF: Fundamental Ratings
FRPH
SVAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6873
SMR RATING
1..100
9196
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2943
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5032

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRPH's Valuation (87) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as SVAUF (99) in the null industry. This means that FRPH’s stock grew similarly to SVAUF’s over the last 12 months.

FRPH's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as SVAUF (73) in the null industry. This means that FRPH’s stock grew similarly to SVAUF’s over the last 12 months.

FRPH's SMR Rating (91) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as SVAUF (96) in the null industry. This means that FRPH’s stock grew similarly to SVAUF’s over the last 12 months.

SVAUF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRPH (81) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that SVAUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

FRPH's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as SVAUF (43) in the null industry. This means that FRPH’s stock grew similarly to SVAUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRPHSVAUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
50%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VVONX24.650.33
+1.36%
Invesco Value Opportunities R5
ESCQX11.540.11
+0.96%
Embark Small Cap Equity Retirement
EACPX62.860.28
+0.45%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr A
THOAX47.320.07
+0.15%
Thornburg Global Opportunities A
VDMRX10.71-0.06
-0.56%
Virtus KAR Developing Markets R6

FRPH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRPH has been loosely correlated with MMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRPH jumps, then MMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRPH
1D Price
Change %
FRPH100%
+1.03%
MMI - FRPH
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
KW - FRPH
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
CWK - FRPH
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
NMRK - FRPH
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
CBRE - FRPH
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
More