FROG
Price
$62.58
Change
+$0.95 (+1.54%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.41B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GTLB
Price
$37.83
Change
-$5.54 (-12.77%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.37B
102 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FROG vs GTLB

Header iconFROG vs GTLB Comparison
Open Charts FROG vs GTLBBanner chart's image
JFrog
Price$62.58
Change+$0.95 (+1.54%)
Volume$1.14M
Capitalization7.41B
GitLab
Price$37.83
Change-$5.54 (-12.77%)
Volume$22.01M
Capitalization6.37B
FROG vs GTLB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FROG vs. GTLB commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FROG is a StrongBuy and GTLB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FROG: $61.67 vs. GTLB: $43.45)
Brand notoriety: FROG and GTLB are both not notable
FROG represents the Packaged Software, while GTLB is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FROG: 70% vs. GTLB: 104%
Market capitalization -- FROG: $7.41B vs. GTLB: $6.37B
FROG [@Packaged Software] is valued at $7.41B. GTLB’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $6.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $279.62B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.55T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.22B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FROG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTLB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FROG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GTLB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FROG is a better buy in the long-term than GTLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FROG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTLB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FROG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GTLB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FROG is a better buy in the short-term than GTLB.

Price Growth

FROG (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.72% price change this week, while GTLB (@Computer Communications) price change was +5.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +48.17%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

FROG is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

GTLB is expected to report earnings on Mar 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.22% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+1.06% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FROG($7.41B) has a higher market cap than GTLB($6.37B). FROG YTD gains are higher at: 109.691 vs. GTLB (-22.893). FROG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -76.94M vs. GTLB (-89.8M). GTLB has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. FROG (612M). GTLB has less debt than FROG: GTLB (392K) vs FROG (13.8M). GTLB has higher revenues than FROG: GTLB (858M) vs FROG (475M).
FROGGTLBFROG / GTLB
Capitalization7.41B6.37B116%
EBITDA-76.94M-89.8M86%
Gain YTD109.691-22.893-479%
P/E RatioN/A521.22-
Revenue475M858M55%
Total Cash612M1.17B53%
Total Debt13.8M392K3,520%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FROGGTLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FROG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GTLB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYSPX102.91N/A
N/A
Rydex S&P 500 H
MDVSX8.36N/A
N/A
MassMutual Diversified Value R5
OSVCX18.62N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Small Cap Value C
ANWPX74.03N/A
N/A
American Funds New Perspective A
BDSIX20.68N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Core Instl

FROG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FROG has been closely correlated with RAMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FROG jumps, then RAMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FROG
1D Price
Change %
FROG100%
+3.27%
RAMP - FROG
67%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
COIN - FROG
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
CLSK - FROG
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.70%
GTLB - FROG
54%
Loosely correlated
+5.59%
DT - FROG
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
More

GTLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLB has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLB jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLB
1D Price
Change %
GTLB100%
+5.59%
HUBS - GTLB
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
TEAM - GTLB
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
COIN - GTLB
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
FIVN - GTLB
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
OKTA - GTLB
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
More