FRMO
Price
$9.01
Change
+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
396.65M
GLAE
Price
$30.00
Change
+$5.00 (+20.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
755.1K
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRMO vs GLAE

Header iconFRMO vs GLAE Comparison
Open Charts FRMO vs GLAEBanner chart's image
FRMO
Price$9.01
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Volume$6.53K
Capitalization396.65M
GlassBridge Enterprises
Price$30.00
Change+$5.00 (+20.00%)
Volume$3
Capitalization755.1K
FRMO vs GLAE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRMO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLAE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRMO vs. GLAE commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRMO is a Buy and GLAE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (FRMO: $9.01 vs. GLAE: $30.00)
Brand notoriety: FRMO and GLAE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRMO: 84% vs. GLAE: 111%
Market capitalization -- FRMO: $396.65M vs. GLAE: $755.1K
FRMO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $396.65M. GLAE’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $755.1K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRMO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGLAE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRMO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GLAE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLAE is a better buy in the long-term than FRMO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRMO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLAE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRMO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GLAE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLAE is a better buy in the short-term than FRMO.

Price Growth

FRMO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +6.88% price change this week, while GLAE (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.77% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRMO($397M) has a higher market cap than GLAE($755K). GLAE YTD gains are higher at: -6.250 vs. FRMO (-7.779).
FRMOGLAEFRMO / GLAE
Capitalization397M755K52,583%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.779-6.250124%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A1.9M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRMO vs GLAE: Fundamental Ratings
FRMO
GLAE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
235
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64100
SMR RATING
1..100
297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
944
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRMO's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAE (80). This means that FRMO’s stock grew similarly to GLAE’s over the last 12 months.

FRMO's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLAE (100). This means that FRMO’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLAE’s over the last 12 months.

FRMO's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLAE (97). This means that FRMO’s stock grew significantly faster than GLAE’s over the last 12 months.

GLAE's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FRMO (54). This means that GLAE’s stock grew similarly to FRMO’s over the last 12 months.

GLAE's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRMO (94). This means that GLAE’s stock grew significantly faster than FRMO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRMOGLAE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRMO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLAE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNGRX25.630.07
+0.27%
Sit International Growth
TEQPX13.010.02
+0.15%
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq Idx Prem
PMIYX11.03-0.01
-0.09%
Putnam Multi-Asset Income Y
SBSPX50.05-0.14
-0.28%
Franklin S&P 500 Index A
ITYYX71.42-0.46
-0.64%
Invesco Technology Y

FRMO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRMO and GEG have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRMO and GEG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRMO
1D Price
Change %
FRMO100%
+0.11%
GEG - FRMO
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
GLAE - FRMO
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRRPF - FRMO
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFXXF - FRMO
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIMFF - FRMO
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
More

GLAE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLAE and ICMB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLAE and ICMB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLAE
1D Price
Change %
GLAE100%
N/A
ICMB - GLAE
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
FNNCF - GLAE
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
FRMO - GLAE
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
FFXXF - GLAE
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - GLAE
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More