Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRLPX vs NSFKX
FRLPX vs NSFKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRLPX has more cash in the bank: 22.8B vs. NSFKX (15M). FRLPX pays higher dividends than NSFKX: FRLPX (1.88) vs NSFKX (1.33). FRLPX was incepted earlier than NSFKX: FRLPX (5 years) vs NSFKX (8 years). NSFKX (1.67) is less costly to investors than FRLPX (0.05). NSFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FRLPX (7.00). NSFKX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRLPX: NSFKX (1000000) vs FRLPX (2000000000). FRLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.76 vs. NSFKX (7.95). FRLPX return over 5 years is better than : 70.87 vs. NSFKX (34.54).
| FRLPX | NSFKX | FRLPX / NSFKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.55 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.67 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.985 | 6.341 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 1000000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.8B | 15M | 152,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 1.33 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.76 | 7.95 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.55 | 40.10 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.87 | 34.54 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement