Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRLCX vs VRTPX
FRLCX vs VRTPX Comparison
Open Charts FRLCX vs VRTPX
Nuveen Real Estate Securities C
Price$13.56
Change+$0.07 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets850.9M
Vanguard Real Estate II Index
Price$21.56
Change+$0.11 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.49B
FRLCX vs VRTPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRLCX vs. VRTPX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRLCX is a Buy and VRTPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRTPX has more cash in the bank: 9.49B vs. FRLCX (851M). VRTPX pays higher dividends than FRLCX: VRTPX (3.79) vs FRLCX (2.59). FRLCX was incepted earlier than VRTPX: FRLCX (26 years) vs VRTPX (8 years). FRLCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than VRTPX (0.08). FRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. VRTPX (4.00). FRLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VRTPX: FRLCX (2500) vs VRTPX (100000000). VRTPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.92 vs. FRLCX (-7.80). VRTPX return over 5 years is better than : 33.25 vs. FRLCX (-13.29).
| FRLCX | VRTPX | FRLCX / VRTPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.08 | 2,413% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.08 | 2,525% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.230 | 2.620 | -47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 851M | 9.49B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 3.79 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.80 | 1.92 | -407% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.59 | -0.47 | 5,056% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.29 | 33.25 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement