Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRISX vs RWMFX
FRISX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FRISX vs RWMFX
Franklin Rising Dividends R6
Price$97.56
Change+$0.23 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.05B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.07
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
FRISX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRISX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRISX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. FRISX (28.1B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FRISX: RWMFX (1.43) vs FRISX (0.95). FRISX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FRISX (12 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). FRISX (0.53) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FRISX (12.32). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRISX: RWMFX (250) vs FRISX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. FRISX (1.65). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.81 vs. FRISX (39.04).
| FRISX | RWMFX | FRISX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.31 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.31 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.038 | 8.213 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.1B | 205B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.43 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.65 | 7.95 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.13 | 34.82 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.04 | 50.81 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.76 | 83.34 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement