FRHLF
Price
$9.40
Change
+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.58B
ZPTAF
Price
$4.53
Change
+$0.05 (+1.12%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
614.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRHLF vs ZPTAF

Header iconFRHLF vs ZPTAF Comparison
Open Charts FRHLF vs ZPTAFBanner chart's image
Freehold Royalties
Price$9.40
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Volume$11.58K
Capitalization1.58B
Surge Energy
Price$4.53
Change+$0.05 (+1.12%)
Volume$33.14K
Capitalization614.24M
FRHLF vs ZPTAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZPTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRHLF vs. ZPTAF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRHLF is a Hold and ZPTAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FRHLF: $9.40 vs. ZPTAF: $4.53)
Brand notoriety: FRHLF and ZPTAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRHLF: 15% vs. ZPTAF: 62%
Market capitalization -- FRHLF: $1.58B vs. ZPTAF: $614.24M
FRHLF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $1.58B. ZPTAF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $614.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRHLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZPTAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZPTAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRHLF is a better buy in the long-term than ZPTAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRHLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZPTAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRHLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ZPTAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZPTAF is a better buy in the short-term than FRHLF.

Price Growth

FRHLF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.24% price change this week, while ZPTAF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +1.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.44% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRHLF($1.58B) has a higher market cap than ZPTAF($614M). FRHLF has higher P/E ratio than ZPTAF: FRHLF (13.19) vs ZPTAF (2.68). ZPTAF YTD gains are higher at: 11.802 vs. FRHLF (5.714). ZPTAF (385M) and FRHLF (370M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . ZPTAF has more cash in the bank: 1.87M vs. FRHLF (508K). FRHLF has less debt than ZPTAF: FRHLF (161M) vs ZPTAF (338M). ZPTAF has higher revenues than FRHLF: ZPTAF (728M) vs FRHLF (382M).
FRHLFZPTAFFRHLF / ZPTAF
Capitalization1.58B614M258%
EBITDA370M385M96%
Gain YTD5.71411.80248%
P/E Ratio13.192.68493%
Revenue382M728M52%
Total Cash508K1.87M27%
Total Debt161M338M48%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRHLF vs ZPTAF: Fundamental Ratings
FRHLF
ZPTAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3670
SMR RATING
1..100
5491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7384
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZPTAF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as FRHLF (17). This means that ZPTAF’s stock grew similarly to FRHLF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZPTAF (70). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHLF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZPTAF (91). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

ZPTAF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FRHLF (53). This means that ZPTAF’s stock grew similarly to FRHLF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHLF's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPTAF (84). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew similarly to ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRHLFZPTAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZPTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MBCSX25.340.26
+1.04%
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth R5
IVKAX22.320.11
+0.50%
VY® Invesco Comstock A
FCBSX34.740.16
+0.46%
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value C
WLIVX18.200.08
+0.44%
WCM Focused International Equity Inv
FTADX55.830.13
+0.23%
Fidelity Advisor International Discv M

FRHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRHLF has been closely correlated with SPGYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRHLF jumps, then SPGYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRHLF
1D Price
Change %
FRHLF100%
+0.10%
SPGYF - FRHLF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
CRLFF - FRHLF
67%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
ZPTAF - FRHLF
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
TNEYF - FRHLF
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
PEYUF - FRHLF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
More

ZPTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZPTAF has been closely correlated with TNEYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZPTAF jumps, then TNEYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZPTAF
1D Price
Change %
ZPTAF100%
+1.00%
TNEYF - ZPTAF
76%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
MEGEF - ZPTAF
75%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
SPGYF - ZPTAF
74%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
CRLFF - ZPTAF
74%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
CDDRF - ZPTAF
67%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
More