Advertisement
FRHLF vs TNEYF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRHLF is a Hold and TNEYF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRHLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTNEYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FRHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TNEYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRHLF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNEYF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FRHLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TNEYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FRHLF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +5.63% price change this week, while TNEYF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +6.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +5.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +49.05%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (+5.89% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| FRHLF | TNEYF | FRHLF / TNEYF | |
| Capitalization | 1.58B | 1.52B | 104% |
| EBITDA | 370M | 897M | 41% |
| Gain YTD | 7.424 | 6.907 | 107% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.19 | 9.00 | 147% |
| Revenue | 382M | 1.53B | 25% |
| Total Cash | 508K | 97.5M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 161M | 1.36B | 12% |
FRHLF | TNEYF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRHLF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as TNEYF (36). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew similarly to TNEYF’s over the last 12 months.
FRHLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as TNEYF (41). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew similarly to TNEYF’s over the last 12 months.
FRHLF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as TNEYF (60). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew similarly to TNEYF’s over the last 12 months.
TNEYF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FRHLF (49). This means that TNEYF’s stock grew similarly to FRHLF’s over the last 12 months.
FRHLF's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as TNEYF (98). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew similarly to TNEYF’s over the last 12 months.
| FRHLF | TNEYF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 70% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MRJCX | 10.73 | 0.04 | +0.37% |
| Morgan Stanley Multi-Asset Real Return C | |||
| IPETX | 6.16 | -0.06 | -0.96% |
| Voya Large Cap Value Port S2 | |||
| LTFOX | 19.48 | -0.20 | -1.02% |
| Lord Abbett Affiliated F3 | |||
| DRGTX | 92.80 | -1.25 | -1.33% |
| Virtus Zevenbergen Technology Inst | |||
| TLASX | 11.32 | -0.16 | -1.39% |
| Transamerica Large Core ESG R6 | |||
FRHLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRHLF has been closely correlated with SPGYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRHLF jumps, then SPGYF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRHLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRHLF | 100% | +1.27% | ||
| SPGYF - FRHLF | 68% Closely correlated | +2.98% | ||
| CRLFF - FRHLF | 67% Closely correlated | +3.37% | ||
| ZPTAF - FRHLF | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| TNEYF - FRHLF | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.49% | ||
| PEYUF - FRHLF | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
More | ||||
TNEYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNEYF has been closely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TNEYF jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TNEYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNEYF | 100% | +3.49% | ||
| ZPTAF - TNEYF | 78% Closely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| SPGYF - TNEYF | 73% Closely correlated | +2.98% | ||
| MEGEF - TNEYF | 72% Closely correlated | +2.45% | ||
| CDDRF - TNEYF | 72% Closely correlated | +2.79% | ||
| CRLFF - TNEYF | 70% Closely correlated | +3.37% | ||
More | ||||