FRGT
Price
$1.19
Change
-$0.20 (-14.39%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.84M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XROLF
Price
$103.81
Change
-$4.19 (-3.88%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
11.6B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRGT vs XROLF

Header iconFRGT vs XROLF Comparison
Open Charts FRGT vs XROLFBanner chart's image
Freight Technologies
Price$1.19
Change-$0.20 (-14.39%)
Volume$110.92K
Capitalization1.84M
Xero
Price$103.81
Change-$4.19 (-3.88%)
Volume$125
Capitalization11.6B
FRGT vs XROLF Comparison Chart in %
FRGT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XROLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRGT vs. XROLF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRGT is a Buy and XROLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FRGT: $1.19 vs. XROLF: $65.00)
Brand notoriety: FRGT and XROLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRGT: 32% vs. XROLF: 502%
Market capitalization -- FRGT: $1.84M vs. XROLF: $11.6B
FRGT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.84M. XROLF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $11.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $240.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $6.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRGT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXROLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRGT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XROLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRGT is a better buy in the long-term than XROLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRGT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XROLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRGT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • XROLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FRGT and XROLF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FRGT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -17.36% price change this week, while XROLF (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -7.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +154.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-7.11% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XROLF($11.6B) has a higher market cap than FRGT($1.84M). XROLF has higher P/E ratio than FRGT: XROLF (62.57) vs FRGT (0.02). XROLF YTD gains are higher at: -11.805 vs. FRGT (-29.167). XROLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 730M vs. FRGT (-4.22M). FRGT has less debt than XROLF: FRGT (5.35M) vs XROLF (1.22B). XROLF has higher revenues than FRGT: XROLF (2.04B) vs FRGT (13.3M).
FRGTXROLFFRGT / XROLF
Capitalization1.84M11.6B0%
EBITDA-4.22M730M-1%
Gain YTD-29.167-11.805247%
P/E Ratio0.0262.570%
Revenue13.3M2.04B1%
Total CashN/A2.12B-
Total Debt5.35M1.22B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRGT vs XROLF: Fundamental Ratings
FRGT
XROLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8884
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9874
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9788
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10095
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
41n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRGT's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XROLF (79). This means that FRGT’s stock grew somewhat faster than XROLF’s over the last 12 months.

FRGT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as XROLF (100). This means that FRGT’s stock grew similarly to XROLF’s over the last 12 months.

XROLF's SMR Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as FRGT (98). This means that XROLF’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

XROLF's Price Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as FRGT (97). This means that XROLF’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

XROLF's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as FRGT (100). This means that XROLF’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRGTXROLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRGT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XROLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBAT0.79N/A
+0.43%
CBAK Energy Technology
QH0.90-0.02
-2.17%
Quhuo Limited
CION8.90-0.24
-2.63%
CION Investment Corp
PSKY10.81-0.37
-3.31%
Paramount Skydance Corporation
GTM6.92-0.89
-11.40%
ZOOMINFO Technologies Inc.

FRGT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRGT and BMR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRGT and BMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRGT
1D Price
Change %
FRGT100%
-4.03%
BMR - FRGT
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.00%
IMMR - FRGT
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
TTWO - FRGT
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.35%
XROLF - FRGT
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRCH - FRGT
25%
Poorly correlated
-10.80%
More

XROLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XROLF and FRGT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XROLF and FRGT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XROLF
1D Price
Change %
XROLF100%
N/A
FRGT - XROLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.03%
ATEN - XROLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
NEOJF - XROLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRYBF - XROLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+12.68%
XBP - XROLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
More