It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRGT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOPRX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRGT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OPRX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
FRGT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.57% price change this week, while OPRX (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +5.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.56%.
FRGT is expected to report earnings on May 31, 2023.
OPRX is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
FRGT | OPRX | FRGT / OPRX | |
Capitalization | 3.05M | 207M | 1% |
EBITDA | -7.91M | -14.51M | 55% |
Gain YTD | -98.013 | -63.452 | 154% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 1250.00 | - |
Revenue | 24.6M | 62.8M | 39% |
Total Cash | 3.15M | 63.5M | 5% |
Total Debt | 4.49M | 149K | 3,014% |
FRGT | OPRX | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 25 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRGT's Valuation (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OPRX (98) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that FRGT’s stock grew significantly faster than OPRX’s over the last 12 months.
FRGT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as OPRX (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that FRGT’s stock grew similarly to OPRX’s over the last 12 months.
OPRX's SMR Rating (93) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as FRGT (100) in the null industry. This means that OPRX’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.
OPRX's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as FRGT (65) in the null industry. This means that OPRX’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.
OPRX's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRGT (100) in the null industry. This means that OPRX’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRGT’s over the last 12 months.
FRGT | OPRX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago84% | 3 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 7 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 3 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FRGT and SDGR have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRGT and SDGR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FRGT | 100% | +2.45% | ||
SDGR - FRGT | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
ZUO - FRGT | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
OPRX - FRGT | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.69% | ||
OBLG - FRGT | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.84% | ||
ONTF - FRGT | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.75% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OPRX has been loosely correlated with PHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OPRX jumps, then PHR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OPRX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OPRX | 100% | -1.69% | ||
PHR - OPRX | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.04% | ||
PCOR - OPRX | 33% Loosely correlated | +2.23% | ||
HCAT - OPRX | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.55% | ||
PLUS - OPRX | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
PDFS - OPRX | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
More |