Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRGSX vs RGACX
FRGSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FRGSX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
FRGSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRGSX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRGSX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FRGSX (18.1B). RGACX pays higher dividends than FRGSX: RGACX (0.07) vs FRGSX (0.00). FRGSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FRGSX (30 years) vs RGACX (23 years). FRGSX (1.54) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FRGSX (7.35). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRGSX: RGACX (250) vs FRGSX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. FRGSX (3.92). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. FRGSX (3.16).
| FRGSX | RGACX | FRGSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.94 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.94 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.355 | 15.516 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.1B | 332B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.92 | 17.83 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.38 | 58.53 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.16 | 40.02 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.18 | 95.93 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement