Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRGSX vs RGACX
FRGSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FRGSX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
FRGSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRGSX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRGSX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FRGSX (18.3B). RGACX pays higher dividends than FRGSX: RGACX (0.07) vs FRGSX (0.00). FRGSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FRGSX (30 years) vs RGACX (23 years). FRGSX (1.54) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FRGSX (7.35). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRGSX: RGACX (250) vs FRGSX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. FRGSX (2.18). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. FRGSX (5.20).
| FRGSX | RGACX | FRGSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.94 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.94 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.474 | 14.044 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.3B | 329B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.18 | 14.08 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.64 | 41.19 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.20 | 41.95 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.66 | 83.68 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement