FRFHF
Price
$1753.29
Change
-$14.65 (-0.83%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
36.84B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TKOMY
Price
$41.64
Change
-$0.43 (-1.02%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
70.56B
10 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRFHF vs TKOMY

Header iconFRFHF vs TKOMY Comparison
Open Charts FRFHF vs TKOMYBanner chart's image
Fairfax Financial Holdings
Price$1753.29
Change-$14.65 (-0.83%)
Volume$1.97K
Capitalization36.84B
Tokio Marine Holdings
Price$41.64
Change-$0.43 (-1.02%)
Volume$121.35K
Capitalization70.56B
FRFHF vs TKOMY Comparison Chart in %
FRFHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TKOMY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRFHF vs. TKOMY commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRFHF is a Hold and TKOMY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FRFHF: $1660.00 vs. TKOMY: $37.85)
Brand notoriety: FRFHF and TKOMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRFHF: 61% vs. TKOMY: 59%
Market capitalization -- FRFHF: $36.84B vs. TKOMY: $70.56B
FRFHF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $36.84B. TKOMY’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $70.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $122.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRFHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTKOMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRFHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TKOMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TKOMY is a better buy in the long-term than FRFHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRFHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TKOMY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRFHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TKOMY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TKOMY is a better buy in the short-term than FRFHF.

Price Growth

FRFHF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -1.31% price change this week, while TKOMY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +2.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRFHF is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

TKOMY is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.28% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TKOMY($70.6B) has a higher market cap than FRFHF($36.8B). TKOMY has higher P/E ratio than FRFHF: TKOMY (10.69) vs FRFHF (8.04). TKOMY YTD gains are higher at: 2.353 vs. FRFHF (-12.289). FRFHF has less debt than TKOMY: FRFHF (13.8B) vs TKOMY (225B). TKOMY has higher revenues than FRFHF: TKOMY (7.47T) vs FRFHF (30.4B).
FRFHFTKOMYFRFHF / TKOMY
Capitalization36.8B70.6B52%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.2892.353-522%
P/E Ratio8.0410.6975%
Revenue30.4B7.47T0%
Total CashN/A1.01T-
Total Debt13.8B225B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRFHF vs TKOMY: Fundamental Ratings
FRFHF
TKOMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5454
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
426
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6158
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5625
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TKOMY's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as FRFHF (59). This means that TKOMY’s stock grew similarly to FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.

FRFHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as TKOMY (26). This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to TKOMY’s over the last 12 months.

FRFHF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as TKOMY (100). This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to TKOMY’s over the last 12 months.

TKOMY's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as FRFHF (61). This means that TKOMY’s stock grew similarly to FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.

TKOMY's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as FRFHF (56). This means that TKOMY’s stock grew similarly to FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRFHFTKOMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRFHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TKOMY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARWR73.003.67
+5.29%
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals
EVTC30.210.20
+0.67%
EVERTEC
DTSQU10.95N/A
N/A
DT Cloud Star Acquisition Corp.
CATO3.04-0.01
-0.33%
CATO Corp
SRTA4.72-0.16
-3.28%
Strata Critical Medical Inc

FRFHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRFHF and L have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRFHF and L's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRFHF
1D Price
Change %
FRFHF100%
+0.65%
L - FRFHF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
IFCZF - FRFHF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
TKOMY - FRFHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
MKL - FRFHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
MSADY - FRFHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More

TKOMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TKOMY has been closely correlated with MSADY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TKOMY jumps, then MSADY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TKOMY
1D Price
Change %
TKOMY100%
+1.50%
MSADY - TKOMY
75%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
SMPNY - TKOMY
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
BNT - TKOMY
33%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
TKOMF - TKOMY
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.76%
MSADF - TKOMY
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
More