FRFHF
Price
$1599.94
Change
-$6.05 (-0.38%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
35.53B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMPNY
Price
$14.85
Change
-$0.31 (-2.04%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
27.39B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRFHF vs SMPNY

Header iconFRFHF vs SMPNY Comparison
Open Charts FRFHF vs SMPNYBanner chart's image
Fairfax Financial Holdings
Price$1599.94
Change-$6.05 (-0.38%)
Volume$2.86K
Capitalization35.53B
Sompo
Price$14.85
Change-$0.31 (-2.04%)
Volume$134.91K
Capitalization27.39B
FRFHF vs SMPNY Comparison Chart in %
FRFHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMPNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRFHF vs. SMPNY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRFHF is a StrongBuy and SMPNY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FRFHF: $1605.99 vs. SMPNY: $15.16)
Brand notoriety: FRFHF and SMPNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRFHF: 85% vs. SMPNY: 78%
Market capitalization -- FRFHF: $35.53B vs. SMPNY: $27.39B
FRFHF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $35.53B. SMPNY’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $27.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $130.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRFHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMPNY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRFHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMPNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMPNY is a better buy in the long-term than FRFHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRFHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMPNY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRFHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SMPNY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMPNY is a better buy in the short-term than FRFHF.

Price Growth

FRFHF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +1.62% price change this week, while SMPNY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +2.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRFHF is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.85% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRFHF($35.5B) has a higher market cap than SMPNY($27.4B). SMPNY has higher P/E ratio than FRFHF: SMPNY (18.24) vs FRFHF (7.75). FRFHF YTD gains are higher at: 16.820 vs. SMPNY (14.675). SMPNY has more cash in the bank: 1.16T vs. FRFHF (10B). FRFHF has less debt than SMPNY: FRFHF (13.2B) vs SMPNY (694B). SMPNY has higher revenues than FRFHF: SMPNY (5.15T) vs FRFHF (30.9B).
FRFHFSMPNYFRFHF / SMPNY
Capitalization35.5B27.4B130%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.82014.675115%
P/E Ratio7.7518.2442%
Revenue30.9B5.15T1%
Total Cash10B1.16T1%
Total Debt13.2B694B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRFHF vs SMPNY: Fundamental Ratings
FRFHF
SMPNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6620
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
506
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMPNY's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FRFHF (57). This means that SMPNY’s stock grew similarly to FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.

FRFHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as SMPNY (6). This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to SMPNY’s over the last 12 months.

FRFHF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as SMPNY (100). This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to SMPNY’s over the last 12 months.

SMPNY's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as FRFHF (61). This means that SMPNY’s stock grew similarly to FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.

SMPNY's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRFHF (50). This means that SMPNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRFHFSMPNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRFHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMPNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRIS.X0.0066790.005875
+730.22%
IRISnet cryptocurrency
XAI.X0.0216970.000091
+0.42%
Xai cryptocurrency
EOS.X0.266955-0.006530
-2.39%
EOS cryptocurrency
ANKR.X0.009605-0.000381
-3.81%
Ankr cryptocurrency
STRK.X0.136829-0.008180
-5.64%
Starknet cryptocurrency

FRFHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRFHF and L have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRFHF and L's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRFHF
1D Price
Change %
FRFHF100%
+1.98%
L - FRFHF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
IFCZF - FRFHF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.34%
TKOMY - FRFHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
MKL - FRFHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
MSADY - FRFHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
More

SMPNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMPNY has been loosely correlated with TKOMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMPNY jumps, then TKOMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMPNY
1D Price
Change %
SMPNY100%
+0.94%
TKOMY - SMPNY
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
MSADY - SMPNY
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
MSADF - SMPNY
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
QBIEY - SMPNY
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
FRFHF - SMPNY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
More