FRFHF
Price
$1605.99
Change
+$31.21 (+1.98%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
35.56B
91 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MKL
Price
$2083.76
Change
-$8.15 (-0.39%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
26.38B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRFHF vs MKL

Header iconFRFHF vs MKL Comparison
Open Charts FRFHF vs MKLBanner chart's image
Fairfax Financial Holdings
Price$1605.99
Change+$31.21 (+1.98%)
Volume$3.73K
Capitalization35.56B
Markel Group
Price$2083.76
Change-$8.15 (-0.39%)
Volume$135
Capitalization26.38B
FRFHF vs MKL Comparison Chart in %
FRFHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MKL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRFHF vs. MKL commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRFHF is a StrongBuy and MKL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FRFHF: $1605.99 vs. MKL: $2091.91)
Brand notoriety: FRFHF and MKL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRFHF: 85% vs. MKL: 87%
Market capitalization -- FRFHF: $35.56B vs. MKL: $26.38B
FRFHF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $35.56B. MKL’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $26.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $130.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRFHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMKL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRFHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MKL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MKL is a better buy in the long-term than FRFHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRFHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MKL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRFHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MKL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MKL is a better buy in the short-term than FRFHF.

Price Growth

FRFHF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +1.62% price change this week, while MKL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +4.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRFHF is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

MKL is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.85% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRFHF($35.6B) has a higher market cap than MKL($26.4B). MKL has higher P/E ratio than FRFHF: MKL (13.12) vs FRFHF (7.78). MKL YTD gains are higher at: 21.184 vs. FRFHF (16.820). MKL (10.3B) and FRFHF (10B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MKL has less debt than FRFHF: MKL (4.36B) vs FRFHF (13.2B). FRFHF has higher revenues than MKL: FRFHF (30.9B) vs MKL (16.3B).
FRFHFMKLFRFHF / MKL
Capitalization35.6B26.4B135%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.82021.18479%
P/E Ratio7.7813.1259%
Revenue30.9B16.3B190%
Total Cash10B10.3B97%
Total Debt13.2B4.36B302%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRFHF vs MKL: Fundamental Ratings
FRFHF
MKL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6622
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
315
SMR RATING
1..100
9793
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6147
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRFHF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MKL (91) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that FRFHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MKL’s over the last 12 months.

FRFHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MKL (15) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to MKL’s over the last 12 months.

MKL's SMR Rating (93) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as FRFHF (97) in the null industry. This means that MKL’s stock grew similarly to FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.

MKL's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as FRFHF (61) in the null industry. This means that MKL’s stock grew similarly to FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.

MKL's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Specialty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRFHF (50) in the null industry. This means that MKL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRFHFMKL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRFHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MKL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QLTY37.680.12
+0.32%
GMO U.S. Quality ETF
CEW19.09N/A
N/A
WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strat ETF
JLS18.89-0.01
-0.05%
Nuveen Mortgage and Income Fund
NFEB27.55-0.02
-0.06%
Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Feb
SPSK18.58-0.02
-0.11%
SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF

FRFHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRFHF and L have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRFHF and L's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRFHF
1D Price
Change %
FRFHF100%
+1.98%
L - FRFHF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
IFCZF - FRFHF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.34%
TKOMY - FRFHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
MKL - FRFHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
MSADY - FRFHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
More

MKL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MKL has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MKL jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKL
1D Price
Change %
MKL100%
+1.49%
L - MKL
69%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
THG - MKL
68%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
CINF - MKL
68%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
CNA - MKL
66%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
HIG - MKL
66%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
More