FREKF
Price
$17.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
ML
Price
$80.11
Change
-$4.26 (-5.05%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

FREKF vs ML

Header iconFREKF vs ML Comparison
Open Charts FREKF vs MLBanner chart's image
FREEE K K
Price$17.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$654
CapitalizationN/A
MoneyLion
Price$80.11
Change-$4.26 (-5.05%)
Volume$277.51K
CapitalizationN/A
FREKF vs ML Comparison Chart
Loading...
ML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FREKF vs. ML commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FREKF is a Hold and ML is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (FREKF: $17.00 vs. ML: $80.11)
Brand notoriety: FREKF and ML are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FREKF: 84% vs. ML: 138%
Market capitalization -- FREKF: $1.28B vs. ML: $698.72M
FREKF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.28B. ML’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $698.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FREKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileML’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FREKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ML’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ML is a better buy in the long-term than FREKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ML’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ML’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FREKF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.56% price change this week, while ML (@Packaged Software) price change was +15.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

ML is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FREKF($1.28B) has a higher market cap than ML($699M). ML YTD gains are higher at: 27.788 vs. FREKF (-15.381). ML has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.17M vs. FREKF (-17.89B). FREKF has more cash in the bank: 37.3B vs. ML (92.2M). FREKF has less debt than ML: FREKF (119M) vs ML (190M). FREKF has higher revenues than ML: FREKF (17.7B) vs ML (423M).
FREKFMLFREKF / ML
Capitalization1.28B699M182%
EBITDA-17.89B7.17M-249,640%
Gain YTD-15.38127.788-55%
P/E RatioN/A1.80-
Revenue17.7B423M4,184%
Total Cash37.3B92.2M40,456%
Total Debt119M190M63%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ML
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

FREKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FREKF and RDZN have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FREKF and RDZN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FREKF
1D Price
Change %
FREKF100%
N/A
RDZN - FREKF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.03%
SQNXF - FREKF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ML - FREKF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.05%
LYT - FREKF
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.77%
BKKT - FREKF
11%
Poorly correlated
+5.03%
More

ML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ML has been loosely correlated with APP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ML jumps, then APP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ML
1D Price
Change %
ML100%
-5.05%
APP - ML
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
QTWO - ML
37%
Loosely correlated
-5.30%
ALRM - ML
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
S - ML
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
CERT - ML
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
More