FREKF
Price
$19.50
Change
-$1.12 (-5.43%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KCRD
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.27M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FREKF vs KCRD

Header iconFREKF vs KCRD Comparison
Open Charts FREKF vs KCRDBanner chart's image
FREEE K K
Price$19.50
Change-$1.12 (-5.43%)
Volume$1.25K
Capitalization1.13B
Kindcard
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$346
Capitalization2.27M
FREKF vs KCRD Comparison Chart in %
FREKF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KCRD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FREKF vs. KCRD commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FREKF is a Hold and KCRD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FREKF: $20.63 vs. KCRD: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: FREKF and KCRD are both not notable
FREKF represents the Packaged Software, while KCRD is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FREKF: 134% vs. KCRD: 15%
Market capitalization -- FREKF: $1.13B vs. KCRD: $2.27M
FREKF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.13B. KCRD’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $2.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $279.62B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.55T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.22B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FREKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKCRD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FREKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KCRD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KCRD is a better buy in the long-term than FREKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FREKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KCRD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FREKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KCRD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KCRD is a better buy in the short-term than FREKF.

Price Growth

FREKF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.13% price change this week, while KCRD (@Computer Communications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +48.17%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.22% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+1.06% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FREKF($1.13B) has a higher market cap than KCRD($2.27M). FREKF has higher P/E ratio than KCRD: FREKF (131.54) vs KCRD (85.47). FREKF YTD gains are higher at: 7.254 vs. KCRD (-14.458). KCRD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -242.34K vs. FREKF (-3.06B). FREKF has more cash in the bank: 29.2B vs. KCRD (9.29K). KCRD has less debt than FREKF: KCRD (502K) vs FREKF (6.5B). FREKF has higher revenues than KCRD: FREKF (28.9B) vs KCRD (421K).
FREKFKCRDFREKF / KCRD
Capitalization1.13B2.27M49,846%
EBITDA-3.06B-242.34K1,261,644%
Gain YTD7.254-14.458-50%
P/E Ratio131.5485.47154%
Revenue28.9B421K6,864,608%
Total Cash29.2B9.29K314,485,730%
Total Debt6.5B502K1,294,821%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FREKFKCRD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FREKF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KCRD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAX15.180.12
+0.76%
Patria Investments Limited
STSS3.090.02
+0.65%
Sharps Technology Inc
LXRX1.35-0.02
-1.10%
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals
JXG3.70-0.05
-1.33%
JX Luxventure Group Inc.
ITT179.52-2.73
-1.50%
ITT

FREKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FREKF and SQNXF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FREKF and SQNXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FREKF
1D Price
Change %
FREKF100%
N/A
SQNXF - FREKF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNAL - FREKF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
SOPA - FREKF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
ARBE - FREKF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KCRD - FREKF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KCRD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KCRD and KGDEF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KCRD and KGDEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KCRD
1D Price
Change %
KCRD100%
N/A
KGDEF - KCRD
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EUDA - KCRD
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.73%
MHUBF - KCRD
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ENADF - KCRD
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FREKF - KCRD
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More