Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRCSX vs SSGSX
FRCSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FRCSX vs SSGSX
Franklin Small Cap Value R6
Price$66.42
Change+$3.67 (+5.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.06B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
FRCSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRCSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRCSX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. FRCSX (4.06B). FRCSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FRCSX (1.14) vs SSGSX (0.58). FRCSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FRCSX (13 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FRCSX (0.61). FRCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.73 vs. SSGSX (50.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRCSX: SSGSX (2500) vs FRCSX (1000000). FRCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.17 vs. SSGSX (3.83). FRCSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.20 vs. SSGSX (-0.23).
| FRCSX | SSGSX | FRCSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.23 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.23 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.186 | 8.123 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.06B | 5.04B | 80% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.58 | 198% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.17 | 3.83 | 291% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.18 | -3.10 | -522% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.20 | -0.23 | -9,806% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.06 | 53.01 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement