Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRCSX vs SSGSX
FRCSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FRCSX vs SSGSX
Franklin Small Cap Value R6
Price$64.42
Change+$1.25 (+1.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.97B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
FRCSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRCSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRCSX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. FRCSX (3.97B). FRCSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FRCSX (1.08) vs SSGSX (0.47). FRCSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FRCSX (12 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FRCSX (0.61). FRCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.68 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRCSX: SSGSX (2500) vs FRCSX (1000000). FRCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.26 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). FRCSX return over 5 years is better than : 46.73 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| FRCSX | SSGSX | FRCSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.26 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.26 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.974 | 2.046 | 341% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.97B | 5.64B | 70% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.47 | 228% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.26 | -1.56 | -337% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.85 | 3.97 | 701% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.73 | 22.95 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.87 | 24.71 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement