FRCOY
Price
$34.82
Change
+$0.24 (+0.69%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
104.82B
82 days until earnings call
JDDSF
Price
$1.29
Change
+$0.04 (+3.20%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
6.46B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRCOY vs JDDSF

Header iconFRCOY vs JDDSF Comparison
Open Charts FRCOY vs JDDSFBanner chart's image
Fast Retailing
Price$34.82
Change+$0.24 (+0.69%)
Volume$84.51K
Capitalization104.82B
JD Sports Fashion
Price$1.29
Change+$0.04 (+3.20%)
Volume$2.05K
Capitalization6.46B
FRCOY vs JDDSF Comparison Chart in %
FRCOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JDDSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRCOY vs. JDDSF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRCOY is a Hold and JDDSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FRCOY: $34.82 vs. JDDSF: $1.29)
Brand notoriety: FRCOY and JDDSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRCOY: 126% vs. JDDSF: 115%
Market capitalization -- FRCOY: $104.82B vs. JDDSF: $6.46B
FRCOY [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] is valued at $104.82B. JDDSF’s [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] market capitalization is $6.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry ranges from $175.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry is $16.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRCOY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJDDSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRCOY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JDDSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRCOY is a better buy in the long-term than JDDSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRCOY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JDDSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRCOY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • JDDSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRCOY is a better buy in the short-term than JDDSF.

Price Growth

FRCOY (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а +7.11% price change this week, while JDDSF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +2.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRCOY is expected to report earnings on Jan 08, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear Retail (+2.95% weekly)

Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRCOY($105B) has a higher market cap than JDDSF($6.47B). FRCOY has higher P/E ratio than JDDSF: FRCOY (37.30) vs JDDSF (9.72). FRCOY YTD gains are higher at: 3.201 vs. JDDSF (-11.815). FRCOY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 847B vs. JDDSF (1.82B). FRCOY has more cash in the bank: 1.67T vs. JDDSF (531M). JDDSF has less debt than FRCOY: JDDSF (3.71B) vs FRCOY (482B). FRCOY has higher revenues than JDDSF: FRCOY (3.3T) vs JDDSF (12.4B).
FRCOYJDDSFFRCOY / JDDSF
Capitalization105B6.47B1,624%
EBITDA847B1.82B46,538%
Gain YTD3.201-11.815-27%
P/E Ratio37.309.72384%
Revenue3.3T12.4B26,573%
Total Cash1.67T531M314,313%
Total Debt482B3.71B12,988%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRCOY vs JDDSF: Fundamental Ratings
FRCOY
JDDSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2045
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53100
SMR RATING
1..100
192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5780
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JDDSF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRCOY (92). This means that JDDSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRCOY’s over the last 12 months.

FRCOY's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JDDSF (100). This means that FRCOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than JDDSF’s over the last 12 months.

FRCOY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JDDSF (92). This means that FRCOY’s stock grew significantly faster than JDDSF’s over the last 12 months.

FRCOY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as JDDSF (52). This means that FRCOY’s stock grew similarly to JDDSF’s over the last 12 months.

FRCOY's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as JDDSF (80). This means that FRCOY’s stock grew similarly to JDDSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRCOYJDDSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRCOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JDDSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AZNH50.890.57
+1.14%
ASTRAZENECA PLC ADRHEDGED AZNH
CGW64.980.38
+0.59%
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
AHYB46.620.04
+0.08%
American Century® Select High Yield ETF
LTTI20.04-0.03
-0.17%
FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF
EVM9.55-0.08
-0.83%
Eaton Vance California Municipal

FRCOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRCOY and AEO have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRCOY and AEO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRCOY
1D Price
Change %
FRCOY100%
+0.70%
AEO - FRCOY
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
FRCOF - FRCOY
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
ATZAF - FRCOY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
JILL - FRCOY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
IDEXY - FRCOY
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
More

JDDSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JDDSF and IDEXY have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JDDSF and IDEXY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JDDSF
1D Price
Change %
JDDSF100%
N/A
IDEXY - JDDSF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
IDEXF - JDDSF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
FRCOY - JDDSF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
JDSPY - JDDSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.77%
ESHDF - JDDSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More