FRCOF vs MRPZF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRCOF is a Hold and MRPZF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRCOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRPZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FRCOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MRPZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
FRCOF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MRPZF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was -0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.47%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Apparel/Footwear Retail (-0.76% weekly)Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.
| FRCOF | MRPZF | FRCOF / MRPZF | |
| Capitalization | 77.5B | 2.29B | 3,381% |
| EBITDA | 618B | 5.11B | 12,106% |
| Gain YTD | -3.187 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 38.31 | 13.50 | 284% |
| Revenue | 2.68T | 32.7B | 8,196% |
| Total Cash | 1.4T | 1.44B | 96,741% |
| Total Debt | 466B | 9.15B | 5,091% |
FRCOF | MRPZF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 69 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRCOF's Valuation (91) in the null industry is in the same range as MRPZF (94). This means that FRCOF’s stock grew similarly to MRPZF’s over the last 12 months.
FRCOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRPZF (100). This means that FRCOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRPZF’s over the last 12 months.
FRCOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as MRPZF (16). This means that FRCOF’s stock grew similarly to MRPZF’s over the last 12 months.
FRCOF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as MRPZF (69). This means that FRCOF’s stock grew similarly to MRPZF’s over the last 12 months.
MRPZF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FRCOF (50). This means that MRPZF’s stock grew similarly to FRCOF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
FRCOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FRCOF and FRCOY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRCOF and FRCOY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRCOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRCOF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FRCOY - FRCOF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
| IDEXY - FRCOF | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.90% | ||
| IDEXF - FRCOF | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.86% | ||
| MRPZF - FRCOF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JDDSF - FRCOF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MRPZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MRPZF and BOOT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRPZF and BOOT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRPZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRPZF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BOOT - MRPZF | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.02% | ||
| MRPLY - MRPZF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ESPGY - MRPZF | 10% Poorly correlated | +8.60% | ||
| IDEXY - MRPZF | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.90% | ||
| JDSPY - MRPZF | 2% Poorly correlated | +9.54% | ||
More | ||||