FRCEF
Price
$1.61
Change
-$0.29 (-15.26%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
2.05B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
HCMLF
Price
$83.43
Change
-$2.77 (-3.21%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
46.02B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRCEF vs HCMLF

Header iconFRCEF vs HCMLF Comparison
Open Charts FRCEF vs HCMLFBanner chart's image
Fletcher Building
Price$1.61
Change-$0.29 (-15.26%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.05B
HOLCIM
Price$83.43
Change-$2.77 (-3.21%)
Volume$2.86K
Capitalization46.02B
FRCEF vs HCMLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRCEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRCEF vs. HCMLF commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRCEF is a Hold and HCMLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FRCEF: $1.61 vs. HCMLF: $83.43)
Brand notoriety: FRCEF and HCMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRCEF: 173% vs. HCMLF: 336%
Market capitalization -- FRCEF: $2.05B vs. HCMLF: $46.02B
FRCEF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $2.05B. HCMLF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $46.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $76.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRCEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCMLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRCEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HCMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCMLF is a better buy in the long-term than FRCEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRCEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCMLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRCEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HCMLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FRCEF and HCMLF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FRCEF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HCMLF (@Construction Materials) price change was -1.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+0.47% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMLF($46B) has a higher market cap than FRCEF($2.05B). FRCEF has higher P/E ratio than HCMLF: FRCEF (158.84) vs HCMLF (11.72). HCMLF YTD gains are higher at: 65.563 vs. FRCEF (-4.161). HCMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.95B vs. FRCEF (36M). HCMLF has more cash in the bank: 4.24B vs. FRCEF (139M). HCMLF has higher revenues than FRCEF: HCMLF (26.2B) vs FRCEF (6.99B).
FRCEFHCMLFFRCEF / HCMLF
Capitalization2.05B46B4%
EBITDA36M6.95B1%
Gain YTD-4.16165.563-6%
P/E Ratio158.8411.721,355%
Revenue6.99B26.2B27%
Total Cash139M4.24B3%
Total Debt2.67BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRCEF vs HCMLF: Fundamental Ratings
FRCEF
HCMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9427
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10039
SMR RATING
1..100
9744
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8483
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1955

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCMLF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as FRCEF (11). This means that HCMLF’s stock grew similarly to FRCEF’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRCEF (100). This means that HCMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRCEF’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLF's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRCEF (97). This means that HCMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRCEF’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRCEF (83). This means that HCMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRCEF’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLF's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as FRCEF (84). This means that HCMLF’s stock grew similarly to FRCEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRCEFHCMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRCEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NPWR3.160.13
+4.29%
NET Power
MMS89.291.17
+1.33%
MAXIMUS
UDMY7.120.08
+1.14%
Udemy
FI130.450.89
+0.69%
Fiserv
WNW1.84N/A
+0.05%
Meiwu Technology Company Limited

FRCEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRCEF and JHIUF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRCEF and JHIUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRCEF
1D Price
Change %
FRCEF100%
N/A
JHIUF - FRCEF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBJHF - FRCEF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLBZF - FRCEF
10%
Poorly correlated
-7.27%
HCMLY - FRCEF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
HCMLF - FRCEF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.21%
More

HCMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCMLF and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCMLF and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMLF
1D Price
Change %
HCMLF100%
-3.21%
HCMLY - HCMLF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
HDLMY - HCMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.40%
CBUMY - HCMLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRCEF - HCMLF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMTOY - HCMLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More