Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBRX vs FSPHX
FRBRX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBRX vs. FSPHX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBRX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. FRBRX (915M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FRBRX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FRBRX (0.00). FRBRX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FRBRX (12 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FRBRX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FRBRX (21.87). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRBRX: FSPHX (0) vs FRBRX (1000000). FRBRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.42 vs. FSPHX (-9.25). FRBRX return over 5 years is better than : -7.26 vs. FSPHX (-13.08).
| FRBRX | FSPHX | FRBRX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.63 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.63 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.416 | 5.358 | 642% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 915M | 5.96B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.42 | -9.25 | -80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.03 | 8.28 | 713% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.26 | -13.08 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.93 | 38.84 | 18% |