Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBRX vs FSPHX
FRBRX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBRX vs. FSPHX commentary
Dec 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBRX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. FRBRX (1.04B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FRBRX: FSPHX (0.01) vs FRBRX (0.00). FRBRX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FRBRX (13 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FRBRX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FRBRX (21.87). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRBRX: FSPHX (0) vs FRBRX (1000000). FRBRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.38 vs. FSPHX (3.63). FRBRX return over 5 years is better than : -0.44 vs. FSPHX (-9.36).
| FRBRX | FSPHX | FRBRX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.63 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.63 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.365 | 5.688 | 710% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 6.67B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.38 | 3.63 | 1,028% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.02 | 5.67 | 1,130% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.44 | -9.36 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.10 | 37.59 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement