Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs SFSLX
FRBCX vs SFSLX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs SFSLX
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$27.87
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets859.51M
1919 Financial Services C
Price$23.08
Change+$0.08 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.7M
FRBCX vs SFSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. SFSLX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a Hold and SFSLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 860M vs. SFSLX (110M). FRBCX pays higher dividends than SFSLX: FRBCX (0.92) vs SFSLX (0.00). FRBCX was incepted earlier than SFSLX: FRBCX (27 years) vs SFSLX (27 years). SFSLX (2.19) is less costly to investors than FRBCX (1.97). SFSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. FRBCX (3.00). FRBCX (1000) and SFSLX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.85 vs. SFSLX (-10.58). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.17 vs. SFSLX (-3.39).
| FRBCX | SFSLX | FRBCX / SFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.19 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 2.19 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.014 | -9.773 | -51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 860M | 110M | 782% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.85 | -10.58 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.91 | -8.02 | -186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.17 | -3.39 | -801% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.74 | 19.01 | 320% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement