Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs SFSLX
FRBCX vs SFSLX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs SFSLX
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$27.34
Change-$0.22 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets809.51M
1919 Financial Services C
Price$25.43
Change-$0.28 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.28M
FRBCX vs SFSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. SFSLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a Buy and SFSLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 810M vs. SFSLX (110M). FRBCX pays higher dividends than SFSLX: FRBCX (0.96) vs SFSLX (0.00). FRBCX was incepted earlier than SFSLX: FRBCX (27 years) vs SFSLX (27 years). SFSLX (2.19) is less costly to investors than FRBCX (1.97). SFSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. FRBCX (3.00). FRBCX (1000) and SFSLX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.26 vs. SFSLX (-13.55). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.64 vs. SFSLX (10.60).
| FRBCX | SFSLX | FRBCX / SFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.19 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 2.19 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.846 | 0.508 | 757% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 810M | 110M | 736% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.26 | -13.55 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.40 | -4.14 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.64 | 10.60 | 346% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.88 | 33.04 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement