Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs SFSLX
FRBCX vs SFSLX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs SFSLX
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$28.24
Change+$0.49 (+1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets849.42M
1919 Financial Services C
Price$22.72
Change+$0.08 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.12M
FRBCX vs SFSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. SFSLX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a Hold and SFSLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 849M vs. SFSLX (106M). FRBCX pays higher dividends than SFSLX: FRBCX (1.02) vs SFSLX (0.00). FRBCX was incepted earlier than SFSLX: FRBCX (27 years) vs SFSLX (27 years). SFSLX (2.19) is less costly to investors than FRBCX (1.97). SFSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. FRBCX (3.00). FRBCX (1000) and SFSLX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.23 vs. SFSLX (-12.58). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.59 vs. SFSLX (-11.14).
| FRBCX | SFSLX | FRBCX / SFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.19 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 2.19 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.938 | 0.132 | 2,979% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 849M | 106M | 801% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.23 | -12.58 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.71 | -13.50 | -94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.59 | -11.14 | -140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.77 | 38.92 | 213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement