Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs SBFAX
FRBCX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs SBFAX
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$26.16
Change+$0.37 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets771.23M
1919 Financial Services A
Price$28.74
Change+$0.25 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.28M
FRBCX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. SBFAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a Hold and SBFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 771M vs. SBFAX (110M). FRBCX pays higher dividends than SBFAX: FRBCX (0.93) vs SBFAX (0.64). FRBCX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: FRBCX (27 years) vs SBFAX (27 years). FRBCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than SBFAX (1.46). SBFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. FRBCX (3.00). FRBCX (1000) and SBFAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.64 vs. SBFAX (-9.16). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.00 vs. SBFAX (31.31).
| FRBCX | SBFAX | FRBCX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.46 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.46 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.430 | -0.931 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 771M | 110M | 701% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.64 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.64 | -9.16 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.78 | 2.59 | -30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.00 | 31.31 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.13 | 47.26 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement