Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs SBFAX
FRBCX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs SBFAX
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$29.59
Change+$2.15 (+7.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets889.97M
1919 Financial Services A
Price$26.37
Change-$3.42 (-11.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.67M
FRBCX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. SBFAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a Buy and SBFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 890M vs. SBFAX (106M). FRBCX pays higher dividends than SBFAX: FRBCX (0.98) vs SBFAX (0.07). FRBCX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: FRBCX (27 years) vs SBFAX (27 years). FRBCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than SBFAX (1.46). FRBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 5.00 vs. SBFAX (4.00). FRBCX (1000) and SBFAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.97 vs. SBFAX (-12.42). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 20.74 vs. SBFAX (-6.16).
| FRBCX | SBFAX | FRBCX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.46 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.46 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.907 | -0.265 | -3,364% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 890M | 106M | 840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.07 | 1,379% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.97 | -12.42 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.51 | -10.09 | -134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.74 | -6.16 | -337% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.40 | 59.53 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement