Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs RPFGX
FRBCX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs RPFGX
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$28.20
Change+$0.35 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets862.03M
FRBCX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. RPFGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a StrongBuy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. FRBCX (862M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than FRBCX: RPFGX (1.35) vs FRBCX (1.10). FRBCX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FRBCX (26 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). FRBCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). FRBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 3.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). FRBCX (1000) and RPFGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.09 vs. FRBCX (23.69). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 125.88 vs. FRBCX (78.32).
| FRBCX | RPFGX | FRBCX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.94 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.94 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.036 | 16.116 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 862M | 1.14B | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.35 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.69 | 31.09 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.85 | 68.82 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.32 | 125.88 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.84 | 98.24 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement