Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs RPFGX
FRBCX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs RPFGX
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$27.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets835.35M
FRBCX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. RPFGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a StrongBuy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. FRBCX (835M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than FRBCX: RPFGX (1.35) vs FRBCX (1.10). FRBCX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FRBCX (26 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). FRBCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). FRBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 3.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). FRBCX (1000) and RPFGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.74 vs. FRBCX (0.71). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 114.72 vs. FRBCX (67.24).
| FRBCX | RPFGX | FRBCX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.94 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.94 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.877 | 16.523 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 835M | 1.14B | 73% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.35 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.71 | 26.74 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.26 | 67.10 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.24 | 114.72 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.30 | 96.32 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement