Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs RPFGX
FRBCX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs RPFGX
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$27.09
Change-$0.45 (-1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets823.68M
FRBCX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. RPFGX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. FRBCX (824M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than FRBCX: RPFGX (1.35) vs FRBCX (1.10). FRBCX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FRBCX (26 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). FRBCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). FRBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 3.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). FRBCX (1000) and RPFGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.80 vs. FRBCX (6.79). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 104.95 vs. FRBCX (56.02).
| FRBCX | RPFGX | FRBCX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.94 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.94 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.862 | 15.834 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 824M | 1.13B | 73% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.35 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.79 | 26.80 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.97 | 54.72 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.02 | 104.95 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.31 | 93.45 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement