Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs RPFGX
FRBCX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs RPFGX
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$28.66
Change-$0.36 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets878.68M
FRBCX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. RPFGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. FRBCX (879M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than FRBCX: RPFGX (1.29) vs FRBCX (1.02). FRBCX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FRBCX (27 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). FRBCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). FRBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 3.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). FRBCX (1000) and RPFGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.90 vs. FRBCX (8.66). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 108.48 vs. FRBCX (66.62).
| FRBCX | RPFGX | FRBCX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.94 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.94 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.765 | 18.434 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 879M | 1.16B | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.29 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.66 | 24.90 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.40 | 73.54 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.62 | 108.48 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.60 | 113.13 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement