Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBAX vs RPFGX
FRBAX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FRBAX vs RPFGX
JHancock Regional Bank A
Price$30.64
Change-$0.38 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets867.78M
FRBAX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBAX vs. RPFGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBAX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. FRBAX (868M). FRBAX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: FRBAX (1.60) vs RPFGX (1.29). FRBAX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FRBAX (34 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). FRBAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). FRBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 3.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). FRBAX initial investment is less costly to investors than RPFGX (5%) vs RPFGX (5%). FRBAX (1000) and RPFGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.90 vs. FRBAX (10.03). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 108.48 vs. FRBAX (72.88).
| FRBAX | RPFGX | FRBAX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.94 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.94 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.306 | 18.434 | 45% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 868M | 1.16B | 75% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.29 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | 24.90 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.42 | 73.54 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.88 | 108.48 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.88 | 113.13 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement