FRAF
Price
$46.37
Change
-$1.50 (-3.13%)
Updated
Sep 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
214.3M
SLRK
Price
$10.75
Change
-$0.24 (-2.18%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
46.22M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRAF vs SLRK

Header iconFRAF vs SLRK Comparison
Open Charts FRAF vs SLRKBanner chart's image
Franklin Financial Services
Price$46.37
Change-$1.50 (-3.13%)
Volume$100
Capitalization214.3M
Solera National Ban
Price$10.75
Change-$0.24 (-2.18%)
Volume$7.95K
Capitalization46.22M
FRAF vs SLRK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRAF vs. SLRK commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRAF is a Hold and SLRK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FRAF: $47.87 vs. SLRK: $10.75)
Brand notoriety: FRAF and SLRK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRAF: 73% vs. SLRK: 88%
Market capitalization -- FRAF: $214.3M vs. SLRK: $46.22M
FRAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $214.3M. SLRK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $46.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLRK’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLRK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLRK is a better buy in the long-term than FRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLRK’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLRK’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLRK is a better buy in the short-term than FRAF.

Price Growth

FRAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.15% price change this week, while SLRK (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.42%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.17% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRAF($214M) has a higher market cap than SLRK($46.2M). FRAF has higher P/E ratio than SLRK: FRAF (14.59) vs SLRK (2.57). FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 64.245 vs. SLRK (13.397).
FRAFSLRKFRAF / SLRK
Capitalization214M46.2M463%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD64.24513.397480%
P/E Ratio14.592.57569%
Revenue76.1MN/A-
Total Cash23.3MN/A-
Total Debt224MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRAF vs SLRK: Fundamental Ratings
FRAF
SLRK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1281
SMR RATING
1..100
514
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1530
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLRK's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRAF (57) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SLRK’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLRK (81) in the null industry. This means that FRAF’s stock grew significantly faster than SLRK’s over the last 12 months.

SLRK's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRAF (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SLRK’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SLRK (44) in the null industry. This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to SLRK’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SLRK (30) in the null industry. This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to SLRK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRAFSLRK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
34%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABZPY12.95N/A
N/A
Aboitiz Power Corp.
GNMLF1.17N/A
N/A
Genomma Lab International SAB DE CV
MSADF23.44N/A
N/A
MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, Inc.
SRCAF0.18N/A
N/A
Stria Lithium, Inc.
ATMTF0.05N/A
N/A
Andrada Mining Limited

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
-0.83%
WNEB - FRAF
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
FUNC - FRAF
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
MRBK - FRAF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
CWBC - FRAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
UBFO - FRAF
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
More

SLRK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLRK and MDIBY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLRK and MDIBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLRK
1D Price
Change %
SLRK100%
N/A
MDIBY - SLRK
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
KGTFY - SLRK
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRAF - SLRK
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
DBSDY - SLRK
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
BPHLF - SLRK
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More