FRAF
Price
$49.23
Change
-$0.99 (-1.97%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
225.04M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RBCAA
Price
$74.97
Change
+$1.69 (+2.31%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:41 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.43B
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRAF vs RBCAA

Header iconFRAF vs RBCAA Comparison
Open Charts FRAF vs RBCAABanner chart's image
Franklin Financial Services
Price$49.23
Change-$0.99 (-1.97%)
Volume$319
Capitalization225.04M
Republic Ban
Price$74.97
Change+$1.69 (+2.31%)
Volume$144
Capitalization1.43B
FRAF vs RBCAA Comparison Chart in %
FRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RBCAA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRAF vs. RBCAA commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRAF is a StrongBuy and RBCAA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FRAF: $50.22 vs. RBCAA: $73.27)
Brand notoriety: FRAF and RBCAA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRAF: 35% vs. RBCAA: 80%
Market capitalization -- FRAF: $225.04M vs. RBCAA: $1.43B
FRAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $225.04M. RBCAA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRBCAA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RBCAA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the long-term than RBCAA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBCAA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RBCAA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RBCAA is a better buy in the short-term than FRAF.

Price Growth

FRAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.85% price change this week, while RBCAA (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

RBCAA is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBCAA($1.43B) has a higher market cap than FRAF($225M). RBCAA (10.92) and FRAF (10.60) have similar P/E ratio . RBCAA YTD gains are higher at: 6.204 vs. FRAF (0.040). FRAF has less debt than RBCAA: FRAF (215M) vs RBCAA (409M). RBCAA has higher revenues than FRAF: RBCAA (406M) vs FRAF (79.5M).
FRAFRBCAAFRAF / RBCAA
Capitalization225M1.43B16%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.0406.2041%
P/E Ratio10.6010.9297%
Revenue79.5M406M20%
Total Cash27.4MN/A-
Total Debt215M409M53%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRAF vs RBCAA: Fundamental Ratings
FRAF
RBCAA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1874
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1518
SMR RATING
1..100
5019
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7564
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRAF's Valuation (36) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBCAA (74). This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBCAA’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RBCAA (18). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to RBCAA’s over the last 12 months.

RBCAA's SMR Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (50). This means that RBCAA’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RBCAA (48). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to RBCAA’s over the last 12 months.

RBCAA's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (75). This means that RBCAA’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRAFRBCAA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RBCAA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HAPBF0.040.01
+18.34%
HAPBEE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
LGRDY32.400.41
+1.28%
LeGrand SA
VOYJF32.58N/A
N/A
Valmet OYJ
BYLB123.00N/A
N/A
Boyle Bancorp, Inc.
SVAUF3.51-0.15
-4.10%
Storagevault Canada Inc.

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with SMBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then SMBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
-2.66%
SMBC - FRAF
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
BHRB - FRAF
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
MNSB - FRAF
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
FXNC - FRAF
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.70%
RBCAA - FRAF
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
More

RBCAA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBCAA has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RBCAA jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBCAA
1D Price
Change %
RBCAA100%
-0.20%
CTBI - RBCAA
89%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
GSBC - RBCAA
87%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
BSRR - RBCAA
86%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
FMBH - RBCAA
86%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
TCBK - RBCAA
86%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
More