FRAF
Price
$37.06
Change
+$0.30 (+0.82%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
113.45M
OVBC
Price
$34.02
Change
+$0.15 (+0.44%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
117.21M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRAF vs OVBC

Header iconFRAF vs OVBC Comparison
Open Charts FRAF vs OVBCBanner chart's image
Franklin Financial Services
Price$37.06
Change+$0.30 (+0.82%)
Volume$16.19K
Capitalization113.45M
Ohio Valley Banc
Price$34.02
Change+$0.15 (+0.44%)
Volume$9.96K
Capitalization117.21M
FRAF vs OVBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OVBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRAF vs. OVBC commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRAF is a Buy and OVBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FRAF: $37.06 vs. OVBC: $34.02)
Brand notoriety: FRAF and OVBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRAF: 54% vs. OVBC: 53%
Market capitalization -- FRAF: $113.45M vs. OVBC: $117.21M
FRAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $113.45M. OVBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $117.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOVBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OVBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OVBC is a better buy in the long-term than FRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OVBC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OVBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OVBC is a better buy in the short-term than FRAF.

Price Growth

FRAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.05% price change this week, while OVBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +14.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OVBC($117M) and FRAF($113M) have the same market capitalization . OVBC has higher P/E ratio than FRAF: OVBC (9.02) vs FRAF (8.33). OVBC YTD gains are higher at: 42.724 vs. FRAF (26.111). FRAF has more cash in the bank: 20.1M vs. OVBC (14.9M). OVBC has less debt than FRAF: OVBC (54.3M) vs FRAF (154M). FRAF has higher revenues than OVBC: FRAF (67.3M) vs OVBC (58.7M).
FRAFOVBCFRAF / OVBC
Capitalization113M117M97%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.11142.72461%
P/E Ratio8.339.0292%
Revenue67.3M58.7M115%
Total Cash20.1M14.9M135%
Total Debt154M54.3M284%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRAF vs OVBC: Fundamental Ratings
FRAF
OVBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2835
SMR RATING
1..100
4649
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1616
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8555

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OVBC's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (56). This means that OVBC’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OVBC (35). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to OVBC’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's SMR Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OVBC (49). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to OVBC’s over the last 12 months.

OVBC's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (47). This means that OVBC’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

OVBC's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (16). This means that OVBC’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRAFOVBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OVBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMCCF9.720.57
+6.23%
Amcor plc
SRRPF4.20N/A
N/A
Shagrir Group Veh Svcs Ltd
FSEN12.58N/A
N/A
FS Energy & Power Fund
SFSVF76.62N/A
N/A
Software Service, Inc.
SWONF9.35-0.15
-1.58%
SOFTWAREONE HLDG AG

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
+0.82%
FUNC - FRAF
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
WNEB - FRAF
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.21%
MRBK - FRAF
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
FCCO - FRAF
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
CWBC - FRAF
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.97%
More

OVBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OVBC has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OVBC jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OVBC
1D Price
Change %
OVBC100%
+0.44%
FUNC - OVBC
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
UBFO - OVBC
33%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
LARK - OVBC
33%
Poorly correlated
+4.36%
FRAF - OVBC
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
BFIN - OVBC
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
More