FRAF
Price
$51.41
Change
+$0.25 (+0.49%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
230.6M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OVBC
Price
$39.93
Change
+$0.52 (+1.32%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
188.11M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRAF vs OVBC

Header iconFRAF vs OVBC Comparison
Open Charts FRAF vs OVBCBanner chart's image
Franklin Financial Services
Price$51.41
Change+$0.25 (+0.49%)
Volume$94.95K
Capitalization230.6M
Ohio Valley Banc
Price$39.93
Change+$0.52 (+1.32%)
Volume$183
Capitalization188.11M
FRAF vs OVBC Comparison Chart in %
FRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OVBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRAF vs. OVBC commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRAF is a Hold and OVBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (FRAF: $51.41 vs. OVBC: $39.90)
Brand notoriety: FRAF and OVBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRAF: 161% vs. OVBC: 40%
Market capitalization -- FRAF: $230.6M vs. OVBC: $188.11M
FRAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $230.6M. OVBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $188.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOVBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OVBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the long-term than OVBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRAF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OVBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRAF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OVBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the short-term than OVBC.

Price Growth

FRAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.74% price change this week, while OVBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.85%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRAF($231M) has a higher market cap than OVBC($188M). FRAF has higher P/E ratio than OVBC: FRAF (14.75) vs OVBC (13.31). FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 2.410 vs. OVBC (-1.426). FRAF has more cash in the bank: 27.4M vs. OVBC (16.8M). OVBC has less debt than FRAF: OVBC (45.5M) vs FRAF (215M). FRAF has higher revenues than OVBC: FRAF (79.5M) vs OVBC (67.5M).
FRAFOVBCFRAF / OVBC
Capitalization231M188M123%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.410-1.426-169%
P/E Ratio14.7513.31111%
Revenue79.5M67.5M118%
Total Cash27.4M16.8M163%
Total Debt215M45.5M473%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRAF vs OVBC: Fundamental Ratings
FRAF
OVBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8151
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1325
SMR RATING
1..100
5055
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4444
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1318
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OVBC's Valuation (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (60). This means that OVBC’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OVBC (25). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to OVBC’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's SMR Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OVBC (55). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to OVBC’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OVBC (44). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to OVBC’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OVBC (18). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to OVBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRAFOVBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OVBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLYYQ0.220.02
+8.24%
Spirit Aviation Holdings, Inc.
SLFPY11.970.60
+5.23%
ABERDEEN GROUP PLC
UBSFF7.84N/A
N/A
UbiSoft Entertainment Inc.
TRNGF0.03N/A
N/A
The Trendlines Group Ltd.
OLCLY18.26-0.30
-1.62%
Oriental Land Co., Ltd.

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
+0.49%
WNEB - FRAF
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
MRBK - FRAF
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
FXNC - FRAF
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
CCNE - FRAF
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
FUNC - FRAF
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
More

OVBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OVBC has been loosely correlated with LARK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OVBC jumps, then LARK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OVBC
1D Price
Change %
OVBC100%
-1.57%
LARK - OVBC
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
BFIN - OVBC
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FRAF - OVBC
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
CFFI - OVBC
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
EBMT - OVBC
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
More