FRAF
Price
$35.40
Change
-$0.59 (-1.64%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
113.45M
OVBC
Price
$31.65
Change
-$0.10 (-0.31%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
117.21M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRAF vs OVBC

Header iconFRAF vs OVBC Comparison
Open Charts FRAF vs OVBCBanner chart's image
Franklin Financial Services
Price$35.40
Change-$0.59 (-1.64%)
Volume$12.91K
Capitalization113.45M
Ohio Valley Banc
Price$31.65
Change-$0.10 (-0.31%)
Volume$7.5K
Capitalization117.21M
FRAF vs OVBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OVBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRAF vs. OVBC commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRAF is a StrongBuy and OVBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (FRAF: $35.40 vs. OVBC: $31.65)
Brand notoriety: FRAF and OVBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRAF: 75% vs. OVBC: 71%
Market capitalization -- FRAF: $113.45M vs. OVBC: $117.21M
FRAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $113.45M. OVBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $117.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOVBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OVBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OVBC is a better buy in the long-term than FRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OVBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OVBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OVBC is a better buy in the short-term than FRAF.

Price Growth

FRAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.51% price change this week, while OVBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OVBC($117M) and FRAF($113M) have the same market capitalization . OVBC has higher P/E ratio than FRAF: OVBC (9.02) vs FRAF (8.33). OVBC YTD gains are higher at: 32.781 vs. FRAF (20.462). FRAF has more cash in the bank: 20.1M vs. OVBC (14.9M). OVBC has less debt than FRAF: OVBC (54.3M) vs FRAF (154M). FRAF has higher revenues than OVBC: FRAF (67.3M) vs OVBC (58.7M).
FRAFOVBCFRAF / OVBC
Capitalization113M117M97%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.46232.78162%
P/E Ratio8.339.0292%
Revenue67.3M58.7M115%
Total Cash20.1M14.9M135%
Total Debt154M54.3M284%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRAF vs OVBC: Fundamental Ratings
FRAF
OVBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2842
SMR RATING
1..100
4649
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1623
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OVBC's Valuation (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (55). This means that OVBC’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OVBC (42). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to OVBC’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's SMR Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OVBC (49). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to OVBC’s over the last 12 months.

OVBC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (54). This means that OVBC’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OVBC (23). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to OVBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRAFOVBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OVBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGREX9.11-0.08
-0.87%
Invesco Global Real Estate R
RYHRX39.47-0.47
-1.18%
Rydex Real Estate H
JMVNX14.58-0.25
-1.69%
JHFunds2 Mid Value NAV
QASGX25.19-0.46
-1.79%
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth A
WMGRX22.82-0.47
-2.02%
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth R

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
-1.64%
FUNC - FRAF
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
FCCO - FRAF
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.06%
MRBK - FRAF
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.77%
EVBN - FRAF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WNEB - FRAF
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.09%
More

OVBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OVBC and UBFO have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OVBC and UBFO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OVBC
1D Price
Change %
OVBC100%
-0.31%
UBFO - OVBC
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.46%
FUNC - OVBC
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
LARK - OVBC
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
FRAF - OVBC
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
HOMB - OVBC
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
More