FRAF
Price
$49.23
Change
-$0.99 (-1.97%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
225.04M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MNSB
Price
$23.01
Change
+$0.30 (+1.32%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:50 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
170.23M
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRAF vs MNSB

Header iconFRAF vs MNSB Comparison
Open Charts FRAF vs MNSBBanner chart's image
Franklin Financial Services
Price$49.23
Change-$0.99 (-1.97%)
Volume$319
Capitalization225.04M
MainStreet Bancshares
Price$23.01
Change+$0.30 (+1.32%)
Volume$417
Capitalization170.23M
FRAF vs MNSB Comparison Chart in %
FRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNSB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRAF vs. MNSB commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRAF is a StrongBuy and MNSB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FRAF: $50.22 vs. MNSB: $22.71)
Brand notoriety: FRAF and MNSB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRAF: 35% vs. MNSB: 199%
Market capitalization -- FRAF: $225.04M vs. MNSB: $170.23M
FRAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $225.04M. MNSB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $170.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNSB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNSB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the long-term than MNSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNSB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MNSB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FRAF and MNSB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FRAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.85% price change this week, while MNSB (@Regional Banks) price change was +10.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

MNSB is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRAF($225M) has a higher market cap than MNSB($170M). MNSB has higher P/E ratio than FRAF: MNSB (12.90) vs FRAF (10.60). MNSB YTD gains are higher at: 11.542 vs. FRAF (0.040). FRAF has more cash in the bank: 27.4M vs. MNSB (20.9M). MNSB has less debt than FRAF: MNSB (69.8M) vs FRAF (215M). FRAF has higher revenues than MNSB: FRAF (79.5M) vs MNSB (72.1M).
FRAFMNSBFRAF / MNSB
Capitalization225M170M132%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.04011.5420%
P/E Ratio10.6012.9082%
Revenue79.5M72.1M110%
Total Cash27.4M20.9M131%
Total Debt215M69.8M308%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRAF vs MNSB: Fundamental Ratings
FRAF
MNSB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1829
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1568
SMR RATING
1..100
5085
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7537
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRAF's Valuation (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MNSB (43). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNSB (68). This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's SMR Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNSB (85). This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MNSB (44). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to MNSB’s over the last 12 months.

MNSB's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRAF (75). This means that MNSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRAFMNSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNSB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HAPBF0.040.01
+18.34%
HAPBEE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
LGRDY32.400.41
+1.28%
LeGrand SA
VOYJF32.58N/A
N/A
Valmet OYJ
BYLB123.00N/A
N/A
Boyle Bancorp, Inc.
SVAUF3.51-0.15
-4.10%
Storagevault Canada Inc.

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with SMBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then SMBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
-2.66%
SMBC - FRAF
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
BHRB - FRAF
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
MNSB - FRAF
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
FXNC - FRAF
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.70%
RBCAA - FRAF
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
More

MNSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNSB has been loosely correlated with FXNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNSB jumps, then FXNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNSB
1D Price
Change %
MNSB100%
+1.47%
FXNC - MNSB
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.70%
BFST - MNSB
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
HBCP - MNSB
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
HFWA - MNSB
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
BHRB - MNSB
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
More