FRAF
Price
$35.40
Change
-$0.59 (-1.64%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
113.45M
FUNC
Price
$28.90
Change
-$0.78 (-2.63%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
152.19M
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRAF vs FUNC

Header iconFRAF vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts FRAF vs FUNCBanner chart's image
Franklin Financial Services
Price$35.40
Change-$0.59 (-1.64%)
Volume$12.91K
Capitalization113.45M
First United
Price$28.90
Change-$0.78 (-2.63%)
Volume$20.72K
Capitalization152.19M
FRAF vs FUNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRAF vs. FUNC commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRAF is a StrongBuy and FUNC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FRAF: $35.40 vs. FUNC: $28.90)
Brand notoriety: FRAF and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRAF: 75% vs. FUNC: 134%
Market capitalization -- FRAF: $113.45M vs. FUNC: $152.19M
FRAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $113.45M. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $152.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FRAF and FUNC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FUNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

FRAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.51% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($152M) has a higher market cap than FRAF($113M). FUNC has higher P/E ratio than FRAF: FUNC (10.14) vs FRAF (8.33). FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 20.462 vs. FUNC (-13.012). FUNC has more cash in the bank: 86.9M vs. FRAF (20.1M). FUNC has less debt than FRAF: FUNC (112M) vs FRAF (154M). FUNC has higher revenues than FRAF: FUNC (71.3M) vs FRAF (67.3M).
FRAFFUNCFRAF / FUNC
Capitalization113M152M74%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.462-13.012-157%
P/E Ratio8.3310.1482%
Revenue67.3M71.3M94%
Total Cash20.1M86.9M23%
Total Debt154M112M138%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRAF vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
FRAF
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2839
SMR RATING
1..100
4639
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1664
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (55). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (39). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (46). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (58). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUNC (64). This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRAFFUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FICGX12.31-0.20
-1.60%
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl A
FQITX13.79-0.24
-1.71%
Fidelity SAI International Qly Idx
WCMAX11.24-0.20
-1.75%
WCM Mid Cap Quality Value Institutional
VSORX43.19-0.80
-1.82%
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp R6
HDSIX20.47-0.39
-1.87%
Hodges Small Cap Institutional

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
-1.64%
FUNC - FRAF
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
FCCO - FRAF
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.06%
MRBK - FRAF
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.77%
EVBN - FRAF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WNEB - FRAF
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.09%
More

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
-2.63%
EFSC - FUNC
66%
Closely correlated
-2.19%
PNFP - FUNC
66%
Closely correlated
-3.28%
UCB - FUNC
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
HTBK - FUNC
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
CCNE - FUNC
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
More