FRAF
Price
$42.40
Change
-$0.35 (-0.82%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
189.44M
FUNC
Price
$34.50
Change
-$0.40 (-1.15%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
224.06M
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRAF vs FUNC

Header iconFRAF vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts FRAF vs FUNCBanner chart's image
Franklin Financial Services
Price$42.40
Change-$0.35 (-0.82%)
Volume$32.2K
Capitalization189.44M
First United
Price$34.50
Change-$0.40 (-1.15%)
Volume$17.66K
Capitalization224.06M
FRAF vs FUNC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRAF vs. FUNC commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRAF is a Hold and FUNC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FRAF: $42.40 vs. FUNC: $34.50)
Brand notoriety: FRAF and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRAF: 84% vs. FUNC: 41%
Market capitalization -- FRAF: $189.44M vs. FUNC: $224.06M
FRAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $189.44M. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $224.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the long-term than FUNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FUNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FRAF and FUNC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FRAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.24% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($224M) has a higher market cap than FRAF($189M). FRAF has higher P/E ratio than FUNC: FRAF (12.93) vs FUNC (9.45). FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 45.477 vs. FUNC (4.514). FUNC has more cash in the bank: 82.8M vs. FRAF (23.3M). FUNC has less debt than FRAF: FUNC (122M) vs FRAF (224M).
FRAFFUNCFRAF / FUNC
Capitalization189M224M84%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD45.4774.5141,008%
P/E Ratio12.939.45137%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash23.3M82.8M28%
Total Debt224M122M184%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRAF vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
FRAF
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
663
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1827
SMR RATING
1..100
5546
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4349
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2081
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (49). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (27). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (55). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (49). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUNC (81). This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRAFFUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALTPF0.04N/A
N/A
Altiplano Metals Inc.
IPZYF0.68N/A
N/A
IP Group PLC
IVTJF7.24N/A
N/A
Investec Plc.
KSBI53.00N/A
N/A
K S Bancorp, Inc.
CHHQF2.97N/A
N/A
China Hongqiao Group Limited

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
-0.82%
FUNC - FRAF
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
MRBK - FRAF
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
CWBC - FRAF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
WNEB - FRAF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
UBFO - FRAF
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
More

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
-1.15%
SHBI - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
-2.05%
FNB - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
UCB - FUNC
67%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
CWBC - FUNC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
WTFC - FUNC
66%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
More